Teams

SWATs

2025 Corpus Christi USPTA Fall League · Ladies 4.0 Flight

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ladies 4.0 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Samantha Bezdek
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Briana Torres
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.73
Loni Latour
published
3.54
Elizabeth Cromwell
published 3.5
3.50
Ashley Ley
published 4
3.37
Starrla Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.33
Kristi Cartwright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Lauri Hefte
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Gwyn Richter
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Ruth Brown
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.22
Leigh Hutchens
usually #3 Doubles 20%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.15
Kathleen Ellsworth
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.14
Sandra Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Debra Miget-Aguilar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Pieri
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Sarah Blaine
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gwyn Richter + Starrla Rodriguez5160% games+7.7% vs expected
Loni Latour + Leigh Hutchens3255% games+3.2% vs expected
Starrla Rodriguez + Loni Latour5062% games+2.6% vs expected
Kathleen Ellsworth + Gwyn Richter2546% games−0.2% vs expected
Lauri Hefte + Kristi Cartwright12754% games−0.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Cromwell + Leigh Hutchens1541% games−9.3% vs expected
Gwyn Richter + Kristi Cartwright314 matchesnot enough data
Kristi Cartwright + Starrla Rodriguez314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Bezdek
27W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Briana Torres
23W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.76
Loni Latour
15W–18L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Elizabeth Cromwell
27W–39L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
4
Ashley Ley
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.50
Starrla Rodriguez
25W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
Kristi Cartwright
42W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Lauri Hefte
28W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Gwyn Richter
25W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Ruth Brown
32W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Leigh Hutchens
26W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Kathleen Ellsworth
28W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
Sandra Sanchez
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Debra Miget-Aguilar
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Pieri
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Blaine
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.