Teams

Net Ninjas

2023 NOVA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-15vs Love BitesWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Holloman / Tina Woods vs Amanda Kerr / Nancy Sicairos1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Rose / Britt Ellinger vs Niki Friedman / Lisa Furgal6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHEATHER HUGHES / Alison Naden vs Devika Eddula / Marlys Nylund6-1, 6-1
2023-05-08vs Rally GalsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Mia Lee / Taylor Marr vs Ingrid Dearman / Ann Storck6-7, 5-3
2023-05-01vs Spring Breakers 3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesAlison Naden / HEATHER HUGHES vs Jeri Borsi / Joan-Marie Turchiano4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Hoehner / Michelle Tenhaeff vs Stephanie Bozarth / Mary Berkowitz6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Thede / Britt Ellinger vs Diane Diner / Christine Hopkins6-3, 6-2
2023-04-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Holloman / Caroline Mia Lee vs Lauren Mencia / Lyn Fay6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-04-10vs Smart AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Holloman / Caroline Mia Lee vs Robin Birchfield / Jen Lager6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLivia Chung / Taylor Marr vs Maria Elena Greene / Melanie Way6-0, 6-1
2023-04-03vs String CourtettesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTaylor Marr / Tina Woods vs Kassie Stewart / Denise Weinig1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesHEATHER HUGHES / Michelle Tenhaeff vs Jennifer Gatewood / Galina Orlova6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jill Holloman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Kendall Mccaughey
published
3.51
Taylor Marr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Caroline Mia Lee
published 3.5
3.43
Wendy Rose
published
3.32
Alison Naden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Michelle Tenhaeff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Britt Ellinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Kristi Nault
published
3.06
HEATHER HUGHES
published 3
2.97
Danielle Davis
published 3.5
Janet Thede
published
Tina Woods
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Mia Lee + Jill Holloman14660% games+6.0% vs expected
Taylor Marr + Jill Holloman314 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Rose + Kristi Nault123 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Rose + Michelle Tenhaeff303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jill Holloman
155W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.94
Kendall Mccaughey
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Taylor Marr
132W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Caroline Mia Lee
46W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.50
Wendy Rose
19W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Alison Naden
117W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Michelle Tenhaeff
306W–196L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Britt Ellinger
31W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Kristi Nault
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.12
3
HEATHER HUGHES
52W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.06
3.5
Danielle Davis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.97
Janet Thede
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Woods
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.