Teams

Boonsboro Triple Vision

2023 Lynchburg Mixed 18 & Over · Lynchburg Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-12vs Down the TWon 10
W#1 DoublesChuck McGinnis / Annmarie Hutchison vs Charlie Durie / Flor Midkiff6-1, 6-3
2023-03-11vs OCC LegendsLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoseph Hutchison / Annmarie Hutchison vs Jesse Naples / Carrie Turner5-7, 0-6
2023-03-04vs Nice AceLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnmarie Hutchison / Joseph Hutchison vs Kersten Morrison / David Royer3-6, 2-6
2023-02-25vs Down the TLost 01
L#1 DoublesChuck McGinnis / Annmarie Hutchison vs Raciel Alonso / Clemmer Allen4-6, 1-6
2023-02-18vs Nice AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoseph Hutchison / Annmarie Hutchison vs Stuart Tinsley / Sherri Sackett2-6, 3-6
2023-02-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnnmarie Hutchison / Joseph Hutchison vs Mark Aldridge / Emily Evans1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lynchburg Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Cheryl Betz
published 4
3.60
Annmarie Hutchison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Kenneth Terrell
published
3.47
David Heppner
published 3.5
3.34
John Reitelbach
published
3.33
Chuck McGinnis
published 3.5
3.32
Sherri Meyer
published
3.27
Jennipher Lucado
published
3.15
Matt Lusher
published
3.01
Joseph Hutchison
published
2.91
Tracy Thomsic
published
2.79
Kelly Terrell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Lusher + Tracy Thomsic12461% games+19.6% vs expected
Jennipher Lucado + Chuck McGinnis134 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Terrell + Kenneth Terrell224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Betz
21W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Annmarie Hutchison
33W–41L career · 6 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Kenneth Terrell
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.56
3.5
David Heppner
19W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
John Reitelbach
14W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Chuck McGinnis
20W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Sherri Meyer
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Jennipher Lucado
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Matt Lusher
23W–24L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Joseph Hutchison
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
Tracy Thomsic
37W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
Kelly Terrell
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.