Teams

GT Bray Senior-Ritas

2025 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · 7.0 W Friday

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-08vs LWN Alley CatsWon 20
W#1 DoublesFaye Blakely / Cecile Wooster vs Sherry Chase / Tammy Hallam6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTerry Olsen / Carrie Scalcucci vs Mary Klueh / Marsha Baker6-4, 6-1
2024-11-01vs LWR TermanettersLost 01
L#2 DoublesNilou Navab / Terry Olsen vs Regina Beatty / Cindy Vavrek1-6, 2-6
2024-10-25vs LWR SteffensLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarrie Scalcucci / Cynthia Norwood vs Kristine Scott / Beth Hill3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTerry Olsen / Joan Hutchings vs Claudia Kelly / Mary Beth Steffens4-6, 1-6
2024-10-18vs Courtside KennedyLost 01
L#2 DoublesTerry Olsen / Lisa Pauley vs Belinda Alexander / Dale Cole6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Cecile Wooster
published 3.5
3.40
Margaret Kirkland
published
3.40
Lisa Simotes
published
3.17
Catherine Bartlett
published 3.5
3.13
Joan Hutchings
published
3.11
Holly Trueba
published
3.10
Lisa Pauley
published
3.06
Christine Goodwin
published 3.5
3.03
Carrie Scalcucci
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Terry Olsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Jackie Fox
published
Faye Blakely
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Faye Blakely + Terry Olsen2343% gamesnot enough data
Terry Olsen + Carrie Scalcucci134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cecile Wooster
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Margaret Kirkland
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Lisa Simotes
41W–51L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Catherine Bartlett
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Joan Hutchings
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Holly Trueba
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Lisa Pauley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Christine Goodwin
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Carrie Scalcucci
42W–83L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
Terry Olsen
80W–129L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Jackie Fox
60W–55L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Faye Blakely
56W–62L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.