Teams

LA LLW Queen Anne 3.5M - John Gonzalez

2025 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Men 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-19vs LA - MountainGate 3.5MWon 21
W#1 DoublesRay Li / Minh Pham vs Nathan Snyder / Daniel Bennett6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBryan Kariuki / Nico Paolella vs Eric Hatfield / Alan Shih6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Gonzalez / Noah Rastegar vs Roy Longman / Greg Martin6-1, 6-0
2025-09-14vs LA - Mulholland 3.5MWon 30
W#1 DoublesStefano Cosentino / Oliver Seaton vs Robert Magdlen / James Garavente6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBryan Kariuki / Nico Paolella vs Steven Frank / Josh Kline6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCosku Turhan / Jorge Castillo vs Jon Kraft / Norman Arnold7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Charlotte Gray
published 4
3.62
Nico Paolella
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Stefano Cosentino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Oliver Seaton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Chinmay Damle
published 3.5
3.44
Bryan Kariuki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Ray Li
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Minh Pham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Ben Newmark
published 3.5
3.32
John Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Timothy Karp
published
Andrew Chin
published 3.5
Cosku Turhan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Amadeus Junqueira De Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.00
Byron Chan
published 3.5
2.94
Rich Pring
published
2.85
Danny Alexander
published 3
Jorge Castillo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Noah Rastegar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlotte Gray
12W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Nico Paolella
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
Stefano Cosentino
26W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Oliver Seaton
18W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
3.5
Chinmay Damle
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Bryan Kariuki
24W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Ray Li
23W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
Minh Pham
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Ben Newmark
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
John Gonzalez
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
Timothy Karp
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Andrew Chin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Cosku Turhan
1W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Amadeus Junqueira De Garcia
23W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.13
3.5
Byron Chan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Rich Pring
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Danny Alexander
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
Jorge Castillo
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Noah Rastegar
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.