Teams

SD 4.0 SDTRC / Ott

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - San Diego · SD Women 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-26vs SD 4.0 Mountain View/ AlvarezSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKerry Ott / Sandy Dielman vs Beth Timpe / Luisa Garcia de la Cabada6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGayle Kehrli / Carol Diggs vs Adriana Diaz / Stephanie Ngo2-6, 2-6
2022-10-19vs SD 4.0 Coronado TC or Cays/ HammondSplit 11
W#1 DoublesShane Rose / Gayle Kehrli vs Jennifer Vanderhyden / Tugce Varol6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Diggs / Natalie Whitmire vs Elsie Hammond / Debra Reilly0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKerry Ott / Sandy Dielman vs Deborah Fitzgerald / Zhuoling Jia5-7, 5-7
2022-10-05vs SD 4.0 Mountain View/ KilleenLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarol Diggs / Annie Chambers vs Veronica Ruffo / Suzanne Lindemann3-6, 2-6
2022-09-28vs SD 4.0 SDTRC/ HansonWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandy Dielman / Kerry Ott vs Soledad Ramirez / Jennie Blacker2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-09-14vs SD LLW 4.0 Coronado TC / WebsterWon 10
W#2 DoublesKerry Ott / Sandy Dielman vs Jada Cade / Vivian McAnally6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Sandy Dielman
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.89
Kerry Ott
published
3.70
Helen Beran
published 4
3.61
Carol Diggs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Gayle Kehrli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.20
Annie Chambers
published 3.5
Natalie Whitmire
published
Roselynn Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gayle Kehrli + Carol Diggs3542% gamesnot enough data
Helen Beran + Carol Diggs134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sandy Dielman
165W–103L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
Kerry Ott
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
3.89
4
Helen Beran
98W–83L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Carol Diggs
22W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Gayle Kehrli
17W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Annie Chambers
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Natalie Whitmire
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Roselynn Brown
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.