Teams

Make It A Double

2025 Corpus Christi 40 & Over USTA League · Forty & Over Mens 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-27vs Tennis RodmanLost 13
L#1 DoublesBart Nelms / John Rice vs Roger Amador / Jason Hawkins1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJames Sales vs John Borkowski0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNick Manjarris / Aaron Rybar vs Chandra Sanwal / Ryan Read2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGary Cosgrove / Chad Dittman vs David Lopez / Steven Trigger6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-01-23vs Tennis RodmanLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephen Woods / Chad Dittman vs Jason Hawkins / Steven Trigger6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesGary Cosgrove / Bart Nelms vs Ryan Read / Chandra Sanwal2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRob Pruett / John Rice vs Leo Cortez / Anil Gungor6-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Forty & Over Mens 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Stephen Woods
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Chad Dittman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Aaron Rybar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
John Martinez
published
3.25
Scott Humpal
published
3.19
Bart Nelms
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Nick Manjarris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Gary Cosgrove
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Maximilian Walker
published
James Sales
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jon Manjarris
published
Rob Pruett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gary Cosgrove + Bart Nelms3554% games+10.2% vs expected
John Martinez + Chad Dittman6852% games+1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Woods
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Chad Dittman
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Aaron Rybar
7W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
John Martinez
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Scott Humpal
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.25
3.5
Bart Nelms
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Nick Manjarris
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Gary Cosgrove
20W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Maximilian Walker
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
James Sales
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jon Manjarris
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rob Pruett
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.