Teams

SDNC 3.0 2 Lit 2 Quit @Santaluz/ Vandling

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - SDNC · SDNC Women 3.0 Holiday M

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#3 DoublesSheenoo Sharma / Christina MacIer vs Darcy Karpman / Peggy Semerdjian3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristina MacIer / Kristen Howell vs Ann Ortel / Marisel Bastias2-6, 0-6
2022-12-08vs SDNC 3.0 Sleigh Belles@ ST/ FarrowLost 01
L#3 DoublesDeanne Davis / Christina MacIer vs Donna Skiles / Tammy Farrow1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLizbeth Flores / Christina MacIer vs Heather Traficonte / Lorena Maquera1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDeanne Davis / Christina MacIer vs Holly Carter / Elia Surran3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSheenoo Sharma / Christina MacIer vs Lim Kaiser / Anna Weight4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKristen Howell / Christina MacIer vs Lory Fisher / Lorena Maquera6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC Women 3.0 Holiday M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Kristen Howell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Christina MacIer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Karen Leininger
published
3.11
Marla Vandling
published
2.68
Elizabeth Li
published 3
2.47
Deanne Davis
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina MacIer + Kristen Howell14854% games+3.7% vs expected
Marla Vandling + Karen Leininger3553% games−6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristen Howell
66W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Christina MacIer
68W–40L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Karen Leininger
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Marla Vandling
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Elizabeth Li
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Deanne Davis
2W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.