Teams

2.5W Winter Doubles Strick-TWOS

2024 2.5W Winter Women Doubles League · 2.5W Winter Doubles League

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings6 teams · 2.5W Winter Doubles League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12.5W Winter Doubles Zacharias/Kielhorn-Launchpad10028211141
22.5W Winter Doubles Smith-PTC73191124191
32.5W Winter Doubles Trish-PTC73191128205
42.5W Winter Doubles Strick-TWOS46131734225
52.5W Winter Doubles Damschroder (Green) Launchpad2892147293
62.5W Winter Doubles Damschroder Blue -Launchpad01022858344

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.14 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carol Honko
published 2.5
Ever Bouyer
published 2.5
2.22
Linda Torbet
published
2.06
Katie Gerlach
published
Cherryl Young
published
Melissa Mugler
published
Michelle Strick
published
Monica Carlson
published
Suzanne Lee
published
Tammy Felgner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Honko + Melissa Mugler4256% gamesnot enough data
Carol Honko + Linda Torbet213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Torbet + Ever Bouyer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Carol Honko
15W–18L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Ever Bouyer
10W–44L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Torbet
36W–78L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.22
Katie Gerlach
2W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Cherryl Young
9W–23L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Mugler
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Strick
25W–40L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Carlson
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzanne Lee
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tammy Felgner
18W–25L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.