Teams

Marus/Jones 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PM

2026 Piedmont Singles 18+ · 4.0 Women Singles

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-26vs Harlan 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMWon 21
L#1 SinglesAnn Martel vs Christina Campbell1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKate Brittain vs Holly Hinshelwood6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesOlivia Linthavong vs Melissa Beeson6-1, 6-1
2026-07-23vs Harlan 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMSplit 11
W#2 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Susan Parsons6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesAmy Gilbert vs Julie Dover6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-19vs Ray 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMLost 02
L#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Kelly Gekas2-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesAnn Martel vs Kristin Williamson5-7, 0-6
2026-07-02vs Harlan 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMWon 30
W#1 SinglesLeslie Marus vs Christina Campbell4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Holly Hinshelwood6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesOlivia Linthavong vs Leigh Abraham5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-25vs Ray 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMWon 20
W#2 SinglesKate Brittain vs Kara Ray6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesAmy Gilbert vs Carrie McElvogue7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-11vs Harlan 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesLeslie Marus vs Morgan Qubein6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAnn Martel vs Holly Hinshelwood2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesKate Brittain vs Julie Dover6-1, 6-0
2026-06-04vs Ray 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnn Martel vs Kelly Gekas3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKate Brittain vs Carol Schuck Dillon4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Leslie Marus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.87
Layne Saunders
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.83
Kate Brittain
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.71
Ann Martel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.69
Olivia Linthavong
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.54
Amy Gilbert
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Layne Saunders + Leslie Marus314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Marus
66W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
4.07
Layne Saunders
151W–74L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
Kate Brittain
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Ann Martel
6W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Olivia Linthavong
40W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.69
4
Amy Gilbert
1W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.