Teams

Marco YMCA - Washak

2021 Collier Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 8.0 Mixed Winter

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-03-06vs Pelican Bay North - RuffoloLost 01
L#2 DoublesNora Slusar / Elvin Vargas vs Jocelyn Badiu / Lawrence Gamblin1-6, 4-6
2021-02-27Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNora Slusar / Elvin Vargas vs Orlando Ferrer / Lori Murphy2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-01-31vs Riverstone 2 - C. MarchandWon 10
W#2 DoublesNora Slusar / Elvin Vargas vs Renee Biggam / Jack Akova7-5, 6-2
2021-01-09vs GreyHawk -Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Huffman / Elvin Vargas vs Dina Viteretti / Dan Curry4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Kristy Cardina
published
3.85
Bobby Marks
published 4
3.80
Karen Huffman
published
3.69
Andrea Washak
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Stephanie Opel
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.65
Elvin Vargas
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.36
Michael Rathbone
published
3.21
Nora Slusar
published
3.17
David Packo
published 3.5
2.91
Carmelo Rubio
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Leticia Lancsarics
published
Mary Fischer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Stephen Kuhn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carmelo Rubio + Andrea Washak4259% gamesnot enough data
Elvin Vargas + Andrea Washak123 matchesnot enough data
Elvin Vargas + Stephanie Opel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristy Cardina
16W–18L career · no lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Bobby Marks
18W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.85
Karen Huffman
12W–20L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Andrea Washak
352W–306L career · 10 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Stephanie Opel
192W–136L career · 7 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Elvin Vargas
127W–111L career · 7 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
Michael Rathbone
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.36
Nora Slusar
17W–10L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
David Packo
11W–26L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%1%
3.17
3
Carmelo Rubio
254W–234L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
2.91
Leticia Lancsarics
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Fischer
122W–111L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephen Kuhn
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.