Teams

Stewart

Mixed 18 & Over · Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-03vs HaireWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrent Abilez / Mandy Weaver vs Kayla Hubble / Dustin Haire7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Vasquez / Kymberli Harper vs James McDuffie / Kathleen Pfluger2-3
2026-07-22vs HeltonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJim Honea / Mandy Weaver vs Tiffany Huebner / Jon Cauthorn6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJacob Maenius / Miranda Stewart vs Jathan Slaughter / Christi Belmont3-6, 1-6
2026-07-08vs RossWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrent Abilez / Halle Jost vs Chasity Ross / Scott Gibbs6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShona Ramos / Craig Gutierrez vs Jared Urbantke / Tina Ashley6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJessie Hoak / Jacob Maenius vs CODY CAULEY / Donna Paul6-4, 6-3
2026-07-01vs HeltonWon 21
W#1 DoublesShona Ramos / Jim Honea vs Jeff Helton / Christi Belmont6-3, 3-0
W#2 DoublesKymberli Harper / John Vasquez vs Jonathon Rittenhouse / Caylee Schellhase6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMiranda Stewart / Jake Powers vs Jon Cauthorn / Veronica Gutierrez0-6, 0-6
2026-06-24vs HaireWon 20
W#1 DoublesHalle Jost / Jacob Maenius vs Dustin Haire / Jannice Rivero6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShona Ramos / Craig Gutierrez vs Brent McCasland / Andie McCasland6-1, 7-6
2026-06-17vs RossWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrent Abilez / Mandy Weaver vs Sol Mayer / Natalie Pfluger6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Vasquez / Kymberli Harper vs Chandra Ross / Binh Vu6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Mixed 18 & Over 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stewart5113511123
2Helton4211721173
3Haire2461226190
4Ross1561224177

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Brent Abilez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.98
Kymberli Harper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Shona Ramos
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Jacob Maenius
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Miranda Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Jessie Hoak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Jim Honea
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Vasquez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kymberli Harper + John Vasquez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brent Abilez
13W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
4.10
Kymberli Harper
37W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.98
Shona Ramos
92W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Jacob Maenius
22W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
Miranda Stewart
60W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Jessie Hoak
72W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Jim Honea
20W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.49
John Vasquez
31W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.