Teams

NIN MXD 40&O 6.0: White/Jakacki

NIN FW Mixed 40 & Over · NIN FW MXD 40 & Over 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesMatt Denny / April Cohen vs Matt Harmeyer / Kimberly Cowan6-1, 6-2
2026-03-20vs NIN FW MXD 40&O 6.0: ScroghamWon 10
W#2 DoublesGreg Salway / Kristina Robertson vs Brian Hart / Irene Marshall6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKristina Robertson / Matt Fabina vs Kristine Valcarcel / Mark Kaufman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPreeti Dembla / Dinesh Agnihotri vs Irene Marshall / Wei Chen6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGreg Salway / Kendell Feaker vs John Ducker / Johanna Ducker2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDinesh Agnihotri / Sea Grandon vs Mark Kaufman / Kimberly Kaufman6-2, 6-0
2026-02-06vs NIN FW MXD 40&O 6.0: ScroghamLost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Salway / April Cohen vs Cindy Friend / Wei Chen4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesGreg Salway / Amy Hoover vs Kristine Valcarcel / Jason Sagan6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-01-10Lost 02
L#2 DoublesGreg Salway / Sea Grandon vs Kris McGuire / Wei Chen3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKendell Feaker / Brent Davis vs Nina Telesca Magnani / Eric Tippmann2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NIN FW MXD 40 & Over 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NIN MXD 40&O 6.0: White/Jakacki62141023188
2NIN FW MXD 40&O 6.0: Scrogham44111332245
3NIN FW MXD 40&O 6.0: Phillips/Valcarcel26111327217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Dinesh Agnihotri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Kristina Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Kendell Feaker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
April Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Greg Salway
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.63
Preeti Dembla
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Megan Weaver
published
Steve White
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Preeti Dembla + Steve White3354% gamesnot enough data
Dinesh Agnihotri + Preeti Dembla134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dinesh Agnihotri
47W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Kristina Robertson
124W–73L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Kendell Feaker
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
April Cohen
55W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Greg Salway
54W–88L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Preeti Dembla
49W–96L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Megan Weaver
53W–56L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve White
303W–144L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.