Teams

4-KMcWhorter-HVCC

2023 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-24vs 9-AJarvis-CHTCWon 10
W#1 SinglesValerie Michael vs Colleen Starns6-1, 6-1
2023-07-17vs 7-MKobayashi-EnoWon 30
W#1 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Mina Kobayashi6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMelinda Duncker vs Gail Gardner6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesCourtney Mangum vs Crystal Pratt6-0, 6-0
2023-07-10vs 1-ACombs-CCCWon 10
W#2 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Thuy Brooks6-1, 6-2
2023-07-03Won 20
W#1 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Jane Stewart6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesValerie Michael vs Kaitlin Keller6-0, 6-2
2023-06-26vs 3-JYoung-Eno-18+2.5Lost 02
L#2 SinglesValerie Michael vs Olga Ryzhikova6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesSterling Ingui vs Janet Ranheim4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-06-19vs 2-LBible-UNCWon 10
W#3 SinglesCourtney Mangum vs Elisa Klein6-0, 6-0
2023-06-12vs 6-KGreen-EnoLost 01
L#1 SinglesMelinda Duncker vs Keshia Green2-6, 1-6
2023-05-22vs 5-LBible-EnoSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Cristina Raiti6-0, 6-4
L#2 SinglesValerie Michael vs Pamela Howell-Davis6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Kim McWhorter
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Deborah Hertzog
published 3
3.03
Melinda Duncker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.86
Valerie Michael
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.73
Courtney Mangum
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.56
Kensy Ryan
published
2.55
Sterling Ingui
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim McWhorter + Melinda Duncker15759% games+4.5% vs expected
Sterling Ingui + Courtney Mangum5348% gamesnot enough data
Kim McWhorter + Valerie Michael5360% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Hertzog + Valerie Michael123 matchesnot enough data
Kensy Ryan + Valerie Michael123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kim McWhorter
223W–79L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.58
3
Deborah Hertzog
37W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Melinda Duncker
80W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Valerie Michael
58W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Courtney Mangum
40W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Kensy Ryan
13W–23L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Sterling Ingui
43W–79L career · 2 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.