Teams

Harris/Fayetteville/FAC

2025 Combo 40 & Over 5.5, 7.5 · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-23vs Schaller-Overton/Rogers/PCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllyn Elleman / Michele Senlikci vs Carrie Overton / Sharon Gunter6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCasey Tauber / Laura Kryzanowsky vs Colleen Daniels / Kristin Webb6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMaria Abdin / Elizabeth Scott vs Suzanne Lankford / Paige Ferguson7-6, 7-6
2025-10-02vs Rickard-Wilson/Centerton/KTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJamie Juergens / Sarah White vs Ginger Butcher / Elena Olson5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMaria Abdin / Elizabeth Scott vs Shannon Allen / Jill Whatley2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAllyn Elleman / Laura Kryzanowsky vs Nellie Jones / Rebecca Cantey4-6, 3-6
2025-09-17vs Anzalone/Centerton/KTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJamie Juergens / Sarah White vs Holly Anzalone / Desiree Bland4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesToni McDuffie / Allyn Elleman vs Janett Rivera / Brooke Redfern6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCasey Tauber / Maria Abdin vs Gayla Saegert / Tabitha Watkins6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Jamie Juergens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Allyn Elleman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.74
Debby Blackburn
published 4
3.73
Casey Tauber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Elizabeth Scott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Maria Abdin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Michele Senlikci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Carol Harris
published 3.5
3.29
Laura Kryzanowsky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Deann Richmond
published 3.5
3.20
Robin Wise
published
Toni McDuffie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Juergens + Casey Tauber4255% games+4.9% vs expected
Laura Kryzanowsky + Michele Senlikci8353% games+4.3% vs expected
Laura Kryzanowsky + Maria Abdin2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jamie Juergens
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.97
4.5
Allyn Elleman
13W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.94
4
Debby Blackburn
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Casey Tauber
28W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Elizabeth Scott
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Maria Abdin
25W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Michele Senlikci
31W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Carol Harris
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Laura Kryzanowsky
14W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Deann Richmond
11W–19L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Robin Wise
20W–21L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Toni McDuffie
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.