Teams

UPTA18FF/Faust/Thornblade

2025 Fun Fall 18 & over - GTL · 3.0 Women FF

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-14vs UPTA18FF/Walters/HollyTreeLost 12
L#1 SinglesAshley Slagel vs Corinne Nickell2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJill Murphy / Jamie Flaherty vs Suzy Clary / Kimberly Alber2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Kimbell / Karen Golden vs Tarah M Smith / Gretchen Lawson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-11-07vs UPTA18FF/Busby/Frank/GCCLost 13
L#1 DoublesMelanie Brake / Sarah Faust vs Molly Netzler / Jamie Bach2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesErin Byxbee vs Rachel Vick6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Kimbell / Jill Murphy vs Christy Glenn / Laurie Koch2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Rogers / Ashley Slagel vs Emily Busby / Melissa Richardson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-31vs UPTA18FF/Blum/GCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelanie Brake / Erin Byxbee vs Taylor Oliver / Catherine Webb3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAshley Slagel vs Paige Hawks1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJeanne Mendelson / Karen Golden vs Nancy Murphy / Ali Wall3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-17vs UPTA18FF/Benfield/Sugar CreekLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Cupples / Erin Byxbee vs Erin Benfield / Jodi Fortenberry6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelli Reinstein / Jill Murphy vs Marissa Moore / Mary Nunes2-6, 2-6
2025-10-10vs UPTA18FF/Pelino/PavillionSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSarah Faust / Melanie Brake vs Gina Pelino / Catie Kelley2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesErin Byxbee vs Brie Soler6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Rogers / Amy Cupples vs Mary Sansbury / Lora Pfohl6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAmy Kimbell / Deidre LaVigne vs Jordan Wise / Melissa Studebaker3-6, 0-6
2025-10-03vs UPTA18FF/McKenzie/ButlerSpringsLost 05
L#1 DoublesAmy Rogers / Amy Cupples vs Jaime Stevens / Haley Eidson3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesErin Byxbee vs Catherine Boetsch3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Brake / Jeanne Mendelson vs Laura Borck / Bobbi Bateman6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMargaret Crumpler vs Anne Taaffe1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Kimbell / Kelli Reinstein vs Susan Tomforde / Karen Tomforde4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Erin Byxbee
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.81
Melanie Brake
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Karen Golden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Kimberley Apple
published
2.71
Kelli Reinstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Jamie Flaherty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Jeanne Mendelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Amy Cupples
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.47
Deidre LaVigne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Ashley Slagel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.20
Amy Kimbell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Lauren Winchester
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Crumpler
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Flaherty + Kelli Reinstein6357% games+12.8% vs expected
Ashley Slagel + Amy Kimbell2546% games+9.3% vs expected
Ashley Slagel + Deidre LaVigne4346% games+8.5% vs expected
Amy Kimbell + Kelli Reinstein7749% games+5.3% vs expected
Melanie Brake + Erin Byxbee9354% games+4.0% vs expected
Kimberley Apple + Karen Golden4747% games+3.0% vs expected
Ashley Slagel + Kelli Reinstein2444% gamesnot enough data
Amy Kimbell + Deidre LaVigne134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Erin Byxbee
54W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Melanie Brake
21W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Karen Golden
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
Kimberley Apple
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
Kelli Reinstein
27W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Jamie Flaherty
24W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.67
Jeanne Mendelson
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Amy Cupples
16W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
2.5
Deidre LaVigne
11W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%59%41%
2.47
2.5
Ashley Slagel
18W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Amy Kimbell
15W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20
Lauren Winchester
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Crumpler
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.