Teams

MARION/James/Men/7.5

2022 Marion Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-26vs FK - FranckWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Gisriel / Jerry Johnson vs John Fannon / Jeff Zysek6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-11-18vs FK - FranckLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Davis / Edward Wilson vs Luis Rosario / Isaac Vergara6-7, 4-6
2022-11-05vs FK - FranckSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMark Davis / John Ulrich vs Stephen Bernard / Glen Gandiongco3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDavid MacAdam / Robert Mazzeo vs Christopher Blue / Jeff Zysek6-3, 6-3
2022-10-29vs FK - FranckLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid MacAdam / Robert Anglace vs John Fannon / Isaac Vergara3-6, 3-6
2022-10-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSteve Gilman / Jerry Johnson vs Michael Garlisi / Paul Steinberg6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-10-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Kluemper / Jerry Johnson vs John Fannon / Ralf Barckhausen6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
David MacAdam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Brett Joyce
published 3.5
3.18
Gary Merrill
published 3.5
3.09
Steve Gilman
published
Jerry Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Mark Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael James
published
Robert Anglace
published
Robert Gisriel
published
Robert Kluemper
published
Robert Mazzeo
published
Terry Womack
published
William Traylor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jerry Johnson + Brett Joyce134 matchesnot enough data
Jerry Johnson + William Traylor134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Davis + Jerry Johnson033 matchesnot enough data
David MacAdam + Robert Gisriel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David MacAdam
61W–43L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Brett Joyce
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Gary Merrill
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Steve Gilman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
Jerry Johnson
68W–75L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Davis
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael James
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Anglace
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Gisriel
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Kluemper
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Mazzeo
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Terry Womack
10W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
William Traylor
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.