Teams

McDonald 18+ 5.0

2026 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 5.0 Women S26

12 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-09vs SperlingWon 10
W#1 DoublesTristen Bryant-Otake / Malini Wijesinghe vs Aria Benjamin / Keira Kelly7-6, 6-0
2026-06-25vs SperlingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTristen Bryant-Otake / Lauryn Douglas vs Keira Kelly / Jacqueline Sperling Hosseini6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarla Menne / Michaella Sullivan vs Rory Wahlstrand / Lauryn Schenck6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-11vs SperlingWon 21
W#1 DoublesMalini Wijesinghe / Ashwika Thotakura vs Jacqueline Sperling Hosseini / Keira Kelly6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMichaella Sullivan vs Rory Wahlstrand1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarla Menne / Lauryn Douglas vs Madeleine Schneider / Lauryn Schenck6-1, 1-0
2026-06-04vs SperlingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichaella Sullivan / Lauryn Douglas vs Aria Benjamin / Jacqueline Sperling Hosseini4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle Niska / Marla Menne vs Madeleine Schneider / Lauryn Schenck7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-28vs SperlingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTristen Bryant-Otake / Malini Wijesinghe vs Aria Benjamin / Keira Kelly7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAva Nelson / Michaella Sullivan vs Rory Wahlstrand / Madeleine Schneider3-6, 6-7
2026-05-21vs SperlingWon 21
W#1 DoublesTristen Bryant-Otake / Ava Nelson vs Jacqueline Sperling Hosseini / Rory Wahlstrand6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDanielle Niska vs Lauryn Schenck0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNathalie Odryzynski / Marla Menne vs Aria Benjamin / Keira Kelly7-5, 6-1
2026-05-07vs SperlingLost 02
L#1 DoublesNathalie Odryzynski / Patricia Goodrich vs Jacqueline Sperling Hosseini / Madeleine Schneider3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKaelie Breiter vs Lauryn Schenck4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 Women S26
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McDonald 18+ 5.05181021160
2Sperling1571123173

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.92
Malini Wijesinghe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.86
Charlotte Bowles
published 5
4.85
Lauryn Douglas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.83
Nathalie Odryzynski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ashwika Thotakura
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Ava Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.72
Danielle Niska
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.55
Michaella Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.49
Tristen Bryant-Otake
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.46
Kaelie Breiter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.32
Marla Menne
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
4.23
Patricia Goodrich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tristen Bryant-Otake + Malini Wijesinghe7063% games+13.6% vs expected
Tristen Bryant-Otake + Nathalie Odryzynski3350% games+2.9% vs expected
Malini Wijesinghe + Nathalie Odryzynski213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Malini Wijesinghe
30W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.92
5
Charlotte Bowles
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.86
Lauryn Douglas
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.85
Nathalie Odryzynski
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.83
5
Ashwika Thotakura
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
5
Ava Nelson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Danielle Niska
18W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.72
Michaella Sullivan
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.55
Tristen Bryant-Otake
23W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
4.49
Kaelie Breiter
28W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
4.46
Marla Menne
17W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
Patricia Goodrich
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.