Teams

Cindy Hummel Tennis / J. Green

2026 Polk Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.69 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-15vs POLK/Combo18&Over5.5W/TullyWon 30
W#1 DoublesJaime Green / Amber Maloney vs Amy Tully / Alexis Wharem7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristin Spencer / Stephanie Barron vs Jessica Fazzini / Karen Evans6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Chevalier / Kristi Durden vs Nikki Hoagland / Diana Williams6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-08vs Beerman Family/ EscowitzLost 03
L#1 DoublesGwen Allen / Shelby Binns vs Brooklyn Lindsey / Alexandra Henderson5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChelsey Johnson / Jennifer Chevalier vs Nicole Escowitz / Cara Geswelli1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCrystal Tijerina / Stephanie Barron vs Ashley Mcentire / Brandy Noel6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-01vs Lakeland country Club/ WeeksLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmber Maloney / Alexa Russo vs Amy Evans / Cayley Miles2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Barron / Danielle Albritton vs Caroline Miller / Heather Mcbride3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSara Thompson / Crystal Tijerina vs Sarah Foushee / Paige Wagner3-6, 2-6
2026-05-18vs Grasslands / L. FeasterWon 21
W#1 DoublesRose Coulton / Kristin Spencer vs Diane Skoronski / Gina Barfield6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSara Thompson / Shelby Binns vs Tracey Ritter / Jenny Black6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Chevalier / Crystal Tijerina vs Clara Copley / Haley Tonge7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2026-05-04vs POLK/Combo18&Over5.5W/TullyLost 12
W#1 DoublesRose Coulton / Jaime Green vs Adriana G.Daunt / Jan Hyman6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGwen Allen / Alexa Russo vs Nikki Hoagland / Elizabeth McWhorter2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Barron / Danielle Albritton vs Amy Tully / Dionne Kohl1-6, 3-6
2026-04-27vs Beerman Family/ EscowitzWon 20
W#1 DoublesJaime Green / Rose Coulton vs Alexandra Henderson / Ashley Mcentire6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSara Thompson / Chelsey Johnson vs Nicole Escowitz / Brandy Noel6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-20vs Lakeland country Club/ WeeksWon 21
W#1 DoublesRose Coulton / Kristin Spencer vs Amy Evans / Cayley Miles6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Barron / Kristi Durden vs Caroline Miller / Carolina Vander Poel3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGwen Allen / Shelby Binns vs Courtney Phillips / Heather Mcbride4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-13vs Grasslands / L. FeasterWon 21
W#1 DoublesRose Coulton / Alexa Russo vs Diane Skoronski / Lauren Feaster6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Chevalier / Chelsey Johnson vs Jeri Thom / Kelly Turner3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSara Thompson / Danielle Albritton vs Clara Copley / Jessica Schneider2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1POLK/Combo18&Over5.5W/Tully7116818161
2Lakeland country Club/ Weeks5316820185
3Cindy Hummel Tennis / J. Green53131128223
4Grasslands / L. Feaster0842042270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Amber Maloney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.86
Rose Coulton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Gwen Allen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.66
Jennifer Chevalier
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
2.55
Stephanie Barron
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
2.37
Kristi Durden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.32
Jaime Green
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.30
Danielle Albritton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.26
Chelsey Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Alexa Russo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.16
Shelby Binns
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.02
Crystal Tijerina
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Albritton + Chelsey Johnson4354% games+10.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amber Maloney
15W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Rose Coulton
110W–109L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Gwen Allen
6W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
Jennifer Chevalier
10W–22L career · 9 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
Stephanie Barron
6W–23L career · 13 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Kristi Durden
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.37
2.5
Jaime Green
10W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
2.5
Danielle Albritton
7W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Chelsey Johnson
6W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Alexa Russo
5W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
Shelby Binns
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
2.5
Crystal Tijerina
6W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.