Teams

Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W PM

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 4.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Belinda Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.78
Lisa Mayberry
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Kim Santiago
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.72
Tiffany Olson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.72
Michelle Ainge
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Sherilyn Rawlings
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.65
Jill Ford
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.63
Andrea Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Michelle McGill
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.60
Kimberlie Bayne
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Tena Maughan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.54
Brenda Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Shelli Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.41
Halli Craft
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Karen Christensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Pam Ollivier
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Smith + Karen Christensen4261% games+16.9% vs expected
Sherilyn Rawlings + Jill Ford6159% games+13.5% vs expected
Tiffany Olson + Brenda Fowler8356% games+10.2% vs expected
Tena Maughan + Andrea Smith3360% games+9.4% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Lisa Mayberry3360% games+8.0% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Kim Santiago10855% games+6.0% vs expected
Andrea Smith + Shelli Johnston11753% games+4.8% vs expected
Halli Craft + Kim Santiago4158% games+4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Belinda Jensen
150W–92L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
Lisa Mayberry
80W–81L career · 12 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Kim Santiago
151W–88L career · 11 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Tiffany Olson
115W–51L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Michelle Ainge
54W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Sherilyn Rawlings
136W–64L career · 9 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Jill Ford
86W–60L career · 7 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Andrea Smith
77W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Michelle McGill
56W–56L career · 7 lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.62
4
Kimberlie Bayne
95W–123L career · type A · 8 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Tena Maughan
87W–84L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Brenda Fowler
87W–76L career · 9 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Shelli Johnston
113W–105L career · type A · 10 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Halli Craft
62W–48L career · 5 lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.41
4
Valerie Blackhurst
71W–54L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.40
Karen Christensen
37W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pam Ollivier
67W–75L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.