Teams

PRC - English

2026 B'ham Spring - 55 & Over Weekday Women, 1:30 pm · 3.0 Women Tuesday

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-14vs PRC - ChomiczLost 12
L#1 DoublesJan Poe / Kelly Bass vs Michelle Segrest / Yvette Weaver4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Crain / Tracey Ponder vs Ella Ruth Stewart / Katherine Willett6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCynthia Guyton / Leigh Zajaczkowski vs Fanny Campos / Gail Bevier1-6, 3-6
2026-04-07vs BCC - FINNEY 55 & OVERWon 20
W#1 DoublesKim Shotts / Tracey Ponder vs Angelika Evans / Patricia Warren7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTamara Cusmariu / Leigh Zajaczkowski vs Georgia Miller / Marion Nichols6-0, 6-0
2026-03-31vs HCC - HartWon 30
W#1 DoublesTracey Ponder / Kim Shotts vs Annelle Murphy / Karen Stevens6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJan Poe / Gaile Randall vs Buffie Whitt / Gail Moore6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesNikki Christopher / Cynthia Guyton vs Kerri Breeding / Raye Gaddy6-1, 6-3
2026-03-19vs TRC - DobbsWon 21
L#1 DoublesTracey Ponder / Ruth Berry vs Christine Smith / Kim Tipton4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Bass / Jan Poe vs Terri Russell / Donna Andrews2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeigh Zajaczkowski / Kim Shotts vs Hollie Durbin / Joanie Waldron2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-03-17vs BH- SchaperWon 21
W#1 DoublesDonna Crain / Leigh Zajaczkowski vs Juanita Gooden / Julie Thomasson7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJan Poe / Tracey Ponder vs Terri Palco / Susan Schaper3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGinger Kontos / Tamara Cusmariu vs Matina Graffeo / Kaye Botes4-6, 5-7
2026-03-03vs YMCA Greystone - LuttrellWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeigh Zajaczkowski / Kim Shotts vs Sherri Bartels / Sherry Butler6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGinger Kontos / Tamara Cusmariu vs Celia Nadler / Cecile Mason7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTracey Ponder / Ruth Berry vs Jenni Falkner / Susan Vincent4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-02-24vs Greystone CC - WheelerWon 21
W#1 DoublesDonna Crain / Kim Shotts vs Paige Gasser / Deb Walker3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJan Poe / Gaile Randall vs Melanie Averill / Kimberly Wilson7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTracey Ponder / Tamara Cusmariu vs Jill Larson / Kris Costigan6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-02-17vs BHRC - PhillipsWon 21
W#1 DoublesCynthia Guyton / Leigh Zajaczkowski vs Marsha Falkner / Renee Gessner6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJan Poe / Kelly Bass vs Kathryn Phillips / Tracye Roberts6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRuth Berry / Tracey Ponder vs Jeanne Gallagher / Martie Martindale6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Kim Shotts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.92
Ruth Berry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.91
Leigh Zajaczkowski
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Jan Poe
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.83
Cynthia Guyton
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Tracey Ponder
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.78
Nikki Christopher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Tamara Cusmariu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Gaile Randall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Kelly Bass
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Donna Crain
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Ginger Kontos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Nancy English
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Shotts + Leigh Zajaczkowski9162% games+6.5% vs expected
Jan Poe + Kelly Bass5354% games+1.3% vs expected
Jan Poe + Nancy English1643% games−9.3% vs expected
Jan Poe + Gaile Randall314 matchesnot enough data
Jan Poe + Kim Shotts134 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Guyton + Leigh Zajaczkowski224 matchesnot enough data
Kim Shotts + Tracey Ponder404 matchesnot enough data
Donna Crain + Leigh Zajaczkowski224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Shotts
47W–27L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Ruth Berry
17W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
Leigh Zajaczkowski
69W–42L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
Jan Poe
28W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Cynthia Guyton
26W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Tracey Ponder
40W–23L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.81
Nikki Christopher
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
Tamara Cusmariu
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Gaile Randall
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Kelly Bass
27W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Donna Crain
29W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Ginger Kontos
19W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
Nancy English
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.