Teams

Skyview Ennett

2025 Marion Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-03vs GO ClementsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMonty Shelton / Bill Minikel vs Michael Fullerton / Cuppy Steven4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRob Fye / Richard Hurley vs Christopher Clements / Jack Gandolfo6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTom Swift / Bruce Smith vs Venkat Veerapaneni / Tyler Jones5-7, 4-6
2025-10-31vs GO ClementsLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Grande / Matthew Pirtle vs Danny York / John Hall6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBill Minikel / Steven Shisler vs LEON GERARD / Larry Pennington7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDennis Malone / Lawrence Ennett vs Michael Fullerton / David Lo Vece4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Matthew Pirtle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Monty Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Richard Hurley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Tom Swift
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Dennis Malone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Jay Hurley
published
2.85
Bruce Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Bill Minikel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
CARL TURNER
published 3
Lawrence Ennett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Martin McMahon
published
Miles Ridgway
published
Rob Fye
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Grande
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Shisler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Pirtle
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Monty Shelton
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Richard Hurley
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
Tom Swift
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Dennis Malone
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.09
Jay Hurley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Bruce Smith
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Bill Minikel
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
CARL TURNER
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lawrence Ennett
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Martin McMahon
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Miles Ridgway
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rob Fye
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Steven Grande
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Steven Shisler
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.