Teams

FTA18C/SpauldingFarm/Hill

2026 FTA COMBO 18 & OVER FTA Sunday · FTA 18+ 5.5 Combo Sunday Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-30vs FTA18C/Cardinal/MurilloWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatricia Surles / Lora Henderson vs Caroline Carter / Jessica Heller4-6, 2-1
2026-08-22vs FTA18C/acac/GitlitzSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLora Henderson / Leigh Wolke vs Cindy Gitlitz / Molly Chann0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Surles / Abby Warren vs Rachael Shepherd / Melissa Richardson7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2026-08-16vs FTA18C/Brookstone/BrockWon 30
W#1 DoublesRachel Graeber / Krista Furman vs Anna Leavitt / Melissa Maude4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBeth Anne Eads / Hannah Martin vs Michele Davenport / Brenda Carter6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAngie Hill / Sarah Hansen vs Kristi King-Brock / Kim Richards6-4
2026-08-15vs FTA18C/Brookstone/DuffyLost 01
L#1 DoublesAbby Warren / Leigh Wolke vs Brandy McNair / Bonnie Haer3-6, 4-6
2026-08-09vs FTA18C/Cardinal/MurilloWon 10
W#3 DoublesCamille Adams / Cindy Hradec vs Andrea Murillo / Jordan Billingsley6-0, 6-1
2026-07-22vs FTA18C/Brookstone/BrockWon 21
W#1 DoublesLora Henderson / Ollie Henderson vs Nicole Finch / Michele Davenport6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAngie Hill / Rachel Graeber vs Leah Winton / Jil Cooke6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKrista Furman / Rebecca Foss vs Kristi King-Brock / Anna Leavitt3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · FTA 18+ 5.5 Combo Sunday Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FTA18C/SpauldingFarm/Hill3081459
2FTA18C/Brookstone/Brock12451186
3FTA18C/Riverside/Pompey02061268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Cindy Hradec
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Abby Warren
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.95
Krista Furman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Lora Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Beth Anne Eads
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Ollie Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Tracey MacDonald
published
2.61
Rachel Graeber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
Ashley Hill
published 2.5
2.38
Rebecca Foss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Sarah Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Foss + Rachel Graeber3345% games+4.7% vs expected
Cindy Hradec + Rachel Graeber4356% games+3.3% vs expected
Tracey MacDonald + Cindy Hradec4253% games−4.6% vs expected
Lora Henderson + Ollie Henderson224 matchesnot enough data
Tracey MacDonald + Krista Furman303 matchesnot enough data
Abby Warren + Cindy Hradec303 matchesnot enough data
Abby Warren + Rachel Graeber303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cindy Hradec
49W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.16
3
Abby Warren
31W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Krista Furman
19W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Lora Henderson
60W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Beth Anne Eads
29W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Ollie Henderson
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Tracey MacDonald
23W–19L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Rachel Graeber
32W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%19%81%
2.61
2.5
Ashley Hill
16W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%37%63%
2.54
Rebecca Foss
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
0%82%18%
2.38
Sarah Hansen
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.