Teams

BAY: Backhanded Complement:Maroni

2024 WMA Adult 18 & Over Men · 3.5 Men 1

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-11vs ETC: Tornadoes:ChasenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRicky Andretta / Samuel Thomson vs Robert Chasen / Andres Guerrero7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChris Seaver / Gabe Seaver vs Sowrirajan Srinivasan / Lavalier Alves4-6, 4-6
2024-05-05vs ETC: Racket Rebels:VossellerWon 31
W#1 DoublesRicky Andretta / Craig Cohen vs Ali Durrani / Matthew Frederick3-6, 6-2, 5-3
W#1 SinglesSamuel Thomson vs Brian Stanton6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKyle Maroni / Peter Ghitman vs Jairahadeep Singh / Emmanuel Ortiz-Alvarez6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrian Fournier / Brian Campbell vs Daniel Kennedy / Christian Polanco4-6, 1-6
2024-04-21vs BAY:Racket Science 18:Metz/PalmerWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamuel Thomson / Yanis Chibani vs Haider Abdulridha / David Hernandez6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChris Seaver / Gabe Seaver vs Scotia Roopnarine / Didier Voisin6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSehoon Ahn / Peter Ghitman vs Bob Leet / Shih-Yen Pan7-5, 6-0
2024-04-06vs ETC: Tornadoes:ChasenWon 30
W#1 DoublesCraig Cohen / Ricky Andretta vs Amit Thakkar / Michael Warren6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSamuel Thomson / Yanis Chibani vs Sowrirajan Srinivasan / SAMPATH SUNDARARAJAN6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSehoon Ahn / Brian Fournier vs Randy Yanoshak / Robert Chasen6-3, 6-2
2024-03-03vs ETC: Racket Rebels:VossellerSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSamuel Thomson / Yanis Chibani vs Matthew Frederick / Ali Durrani6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesRicky Andretta vs Andrew Fortune1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Campbell / Sehoon Ahn vs Emmanuel Ortiz-Alvarez / Brian Stanton6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Fournier / Tim Todd vs Eric Vosseller / Varick Pelton3-6, 2-6
2024-02-24vs BAY:Racket Science 18:Metz/PalmerWon 21
W#1 DoublesSamuel Thomson / Yanis Chibani vs Haider Abdulridha / Ricardo Metz6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRicky Andretta / Kyle Maroni vs Joe Hung / Shih-Yen Pan6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSehoon Ahn / Tim Todd vs Peter Beltramo / Nianqiang Wu4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BAY: Backhanded Complement:Maroni0617716181
2ETC: Tornadoes:Chasen06121225229
3ETC: Racket Rebels:Vosseller06121228225
4BAY:Racket Science 18:Metz/Palmer0671735262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Samuel Thomson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.52
Gabe Seaver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Peter Ghitman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Chris Seaver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Brian Campbell
published 3.5
Brian Fournier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Craig Cohen
published 3.5
3.18
Ricky Andretta
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Kyle Maroni
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sehoon Ahn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tim Todd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Yanis Chibani
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Ghitman + Chris Seaver4452% games+10.4% vs expected
Chris Seaver + Gabe Seaver10957% games+10.2% vs expected
Ricky Andretta + Peter Ghitman9261% games+7.1% vs expected
Samuel Thomson + Yanis Chibani6160% games+6.7% vs expected
Brian Campbell + Kyle Maroni5251% gamesnot enough data
Brian Fournier + Peter Ghitman4357% gamesnot enough data
Brian Fournier + Chris Seaver4347% gamesnot enough data
Kyle Maroni + Brian Fournier314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samuel Thomson
33W–10L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
Gabe Seaver
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
Peter Ghitman
79W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Chris Seaver
37W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Brian Campbell
23W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Brian Fournier
70W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Craig Cohen
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ricky Andretta
60W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Kyle Maroni
43W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sehoon Ahn
40W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Todd
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Yanis Chibani
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.