Teams

Different Strokes

2021 Prince George's Tri-level · Tri-level Women 3.5,3.0,2.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Martin / Archella Dorsey vs Bobbie Garrison / Michele Synegal6-3, 6-4
2021-11-21vs Lady AcersLost 01
L#1 DoublesKarolyn Clarke / Archella Dorsey vs Rebecca Sellassie / Denise Martin Barnes1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-11-21vs SpenderellasLost 01
L#2 DoublesBeverly Taylor / Staci Steward vs Tracy Walls / Tia Briscoe1-6, 0-6
2021-11-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesBeverly Taylor / Staci Steward vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-13vs SpenderellasLost 01
L#2 DoublesDenise Milligan / Staci Steward vs Tracy Walls / Tia Briscoe3-6, 1-6
2021-11-06vs Zimmerman JTCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKarolyn Clarke / Archella Dorsey vs Diem Salmon / Erica Cruickshank6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCasey Royster / Staci Steward vs Lucy Wang / Kimberly Perry0-6, 2-6
2021-10-30vs Lady AcersLost 01
L#2 DoublesStaci Steward / Beverly Taylor vs Cortney Mukushi / Donna Jones2-6, 1-6
2021-10-23vs SpenderellasLost 01
L#2 DoublesStaci Steward / Beverly Taylor vs Mia Dozier / Charmaine Wynter Carpenter2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-level Women 3.5,3.0,2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Casey Royster
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Marsha Williams
published
2.99
Denise Milligan
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.82
Archella Dorsey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Natalie Walker
published
2.74
Staci Steward
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Venita Cooper
published
2.55
Beverly Taylor
published 3
Karolyn Clarke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Royster + Staci Steward4248% gamesnot enough data
Archella Dorsey + Casey Royster134 matchesnot enough data
Denise Milligan + Casey Royster134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Casey Royster
192W–200L career · 9 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Marsha Williams
1W–10L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
3
Denise Milligan
41W–74L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Archella Dorsey
114W–147L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
Natalie Walker
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Staci Steward
120W–166L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
Venita Cooper
20W–23L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Beverly Taylor
8W–16L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
2.55
Karolyn Clarke
8W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.