Teams

+BabyGotBackhand BGBH

SATA Friday Fun League · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-31vs Sips N SlicesWon 21
W#1 DoublesAna Allegretti / Julia Zelle vs Darla Clark / Becca O'Neil6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Dodge / Lorin Sledge vs Desaree Lamacchia / Elisa Yarrington6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHuong Edmondson / Sonia Roper vs Melissa Mcmullen / April Mery6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2026-07-24vs Ranch RaquettesLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Barrientes / Peggy Ussery vs Jackie Peck / Kaye Lynn Keresztury1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAna Allegretti / Julia Zelle vs Hollie Green / Elisa Caudill6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAna Arriaga / Rosalinda Rodriguez vs Liesl Schuh / Laurie Winters1-6, 1-6
2026-07-17Won 30
W#1 DoublesAna Allegretti / Julia Zelle vs Micky Camarillo / Maria Itzel Flores6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Barrientes / Amy Dodge vs Carol Whittaker / Sandra Garza6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHuong Edmondson / Sonia Roper vs Melissa Wiggans / Meridyth Buschardt6-2, 6-2
2026-07-10vs Double TroubleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAna Allegretti / Kellye Rader vs MINNA ROTHE / Faith Williams2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAna Arriaga / Rosalinda Rodriguez vs Sherri Stewart / Kathy Fagan6-3, 7-6
2026-06-26vs SkyballWon 21
W#1 DoublesLorin Sledge / Peggy Ussery vs Jill Fox / Melissa Crank6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHuong Edmondson / Ana Arriaga vs Stacey Harper / Angela Sandidge3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Dodge / Sonia Roper vs Lisa Allen / Tania Kent6-1, 6-4
2026-06-19vs Sweet SpotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Barrientes / Ana Arriaga vs Stephanie DeRusse / Victoria Herrera4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Dodge / Lorin Sledge vs Alison Dearden / Gloria Sanchez5-4
W#3 DoublesRosalinda Rodriguez / Sonia Roper vs Anne Inscore / Janice Barth7-5, 7-6
2026-06-12vs Dominion DollsWon 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Barrientes / Peggy Ussery vs Maribel Cadena / Melissa Woolard6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAna Allegretti / Rosalinda Rodriguez vs Cari Traylor / Patricia Pedraza7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1+BabyGotBackhand BGBH7118614157
2Dominion Dolls6218615155
3Ranch Raquettes5214716128
4Sweet Spots5212919157
5Double Trouble53141021169
6Skyball35141023181
7Sips N Slices35101430216
8Rebels1751939241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Peggy Ussery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Kellye Rader
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Sarah Barrientes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Lorin Sledge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Ana Allegretti
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.70
Julia Zelle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Sonia Roper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Rhonda Claiborne
published
2.65
Huong Edmondson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Rosalinda Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Candace Chanler
published 2.5
2.16
Victoria Fine
published
2.12
Ana Arriaga
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Allegretti + Julia Zelle6160% gamesnot enough data
Rosalinda Rodriguez + Ana Allegretti2344% gamesnot enough data
Sonia Roper + Rosalinda Rodriguez213 matchesnot enough data
Rosalinda Rodriguez + Candace Chanler123 matchesnot enough data
Ana Allegretti + Rhonda Claiborne033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peggy Ussery
29W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
Kellye Rader
15W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Sarah Barrientes
17W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Lorin Sledge
17W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.86
3
Ana Allegretti
11W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Julia Zelle
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Sonia Roper
9W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Rhonda Claiborne
6W–15L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Huong Edmondson
7W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Rosalinda Rodriguez
17W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.52
2.5
Candace Chanler
5W–12L career · no lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Victoria Fine
3W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Ana Arriaga
9W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.