Teams

Heritage Bay / Ludwig

2025 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-02-18vs Naples Grande / OwlerLost 01
L#2 DoublesLen Forner / Craig Tammen vs John Owler / Robert Folger1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-02-11vs Sterling Oaks / DamianWon 10
W#1 DoublesJay Love / Craig Tammen vs Michael Stein / Allen Kupres7-5, 6-2
2025-02-04vs Naples Grande / TarantinoWon 20
W#1 DoublesVernon Keesey / Donald Scanlon vs Heiko Osterchrist / Peter Judson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTomie Faganely / Gary Despins vs John O'Sullivan / Steven Cohen6-0, 6-1
2025-01-28vs Florida/Mishko/65&over8.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesVernon Keesey / Craig Tammen vs Lawrence Solins / Joe Scholl4-6, 5-7
2025-01-07vs The Strand / MortonWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Schneider / Craig Tammen vs George Morton / David Spahn6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Craig Tammen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Donald Scanlon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Frank Carrabba
published
Gary Despins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Hugh Davis
published
Jay Love
published
Len Forner
published
Philip Ludwig
published
Richard Schneider
published
Ronald Mutchnik
published
Tomie Faganely
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vernon Keesey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tomie Faganely + Gary Despins12263% gamesnot enough data
Jay Love + Donald Scanlon5356% gamesnot enough data
Jay Love + Craig Tammen3248% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Craig Tammen
199W–143L career · 4 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Donald Scanlon
31W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Frank Carrabba
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gary Despins
14W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Hugh Davis
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay Love
58W–46L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Len Forner
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Philip Ludwig
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Schneider
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronald Mutchnik
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tomie Faganely
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vernon Keesey
30W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.