Teams

NIN FW A 55&O 7.0 M: WW Libbing/Kosnik

NIN FW Adult 55 & Over · NIN FW Adult 55 & Over 7.0 M

2 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-05vs NIN FW A 55&O 7.0 M: WW WhiteLost 02
L#2 DoublesJoseph Kosnik / John Cowan vs Greg Salway / Tim Koehl4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Marks / Mark Heller vs Jimmy Brown / Matt Fabina2-6, 2-6
2026-05-31vs NIN FW A 55&O 7.0 M: SP WeybrightLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoseph Kosnik / Darren Vogt vs Michael Krahn / Peter Rogers1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBradley Schantz / Stephen Marks vs Timothy Weybright / Doug Nolt1-6, 4-6
2026-05-15vs NIN FW A 55&O 7.0 M: WW GrahamLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoseph Kosnik / Richard Kelty vs Shashank Kashyap / Elmer Toliver4-6, 4-6
2026-05-08vs NIN FW A 55&O 7.0 M: WW WhiteLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoseph Kosnik / Samir Kumar vs Cosimo Lombardi / Timothy Bussick2-6, 0-6
2026-05-03vs NIN FW A 55&O 7.0 M: SP WeybrightLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoseph Kosnik / Stephen Marks vs Peter Rogers / Gary Zoller4-6, 3-6
2026-04-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Libbing / Stephen Marks vs Ken Regenold / Gregory Bleeke2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NIN FW Adult 55 & Over 7.0 M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Joseph Kosnik
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Stephen Marks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Marks + Joseph Kosnik123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Kosnik
19W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.96
Stephen Marks
16W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.