Teams

Walker

2022 Leon Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-07vs Leon - HornerWon 20
W#1 SinglesCliff Walker vs Bill Kirchhoff4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKrishna Namilikonda / Joe Russell vs Brett Bacot / Mark Horner6-3, 6-3
2022-04-06vs Leon - HornerLost 02
L#1 DoublesHarin Desai / Paul Heckroth vs Mark Horner / Thomas Curry7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKrishna Namilikonda / Cliff Walker vs Ira Simons / Andri Randrianasolo2-6, 5-7
2022-03-10Split 11
W#1 DoublesKrishna Namilikonda / Joe Russell vs Todd Kill / Jose Rosario6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesCliff Walker vs Justin Bates2-6, 4-6
2022-03-03vs Leon - HornerLost 02
L#1 DoublesCliff Walker / Sandeep Rahangdale vs Andri Randrianasolo / Ira Simons2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRamesh Munuswamy / Krishna Namilikonda vs Mark Horner / Thomas Curry2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-02-17vs Leon - HornerWon 20
W#1 DoublesHarin Desai / Paul Heckroth vs Greg Nichols / Allen Winsor7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRamesh Munuswamy / Krishna Namilikonda vs Bill Kirchhoff / Brett Bacot6-4, 6-4
2022-02-10vs Leon - HornerWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandeep Rahangdale / Cliff Walker vs Mark Horner / Ira Simons7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-03vs Leon - HornerLost 02
L#2 DoublesJohn Fleming / Cliff Walker vs Ira Simons / Andri Randrianasolo3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRamesh Munuswamy / Krishna Namilikonda vs Thomas Curry / Robert Boyd4-6, 3-6
2022-01-27vs Leon - HornerLost 01
L#1 DoublesHarin Desai / Sandeep Rahangdale vs Andri Randrianasolo / Ira Simons6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Joe Russell
published
3.43
Harin Desai
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Krishna Namilikonda
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.32
John Fleming
published
3.22
Cliff Walker
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ken Pye
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krishna Namilikonda + Harin Desai314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joe Russell
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Harin Desai
77W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Krishna Namilikonda
43W–23L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
John Fleming
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Cliff Walker
65W–90L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Ken Pye
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.