← Teams

MPRC-Rothert/Ayers

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.2 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Lisa Cohns
published 3.5
3.18
Josette Zervic
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Kendra Rothert
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Haihua Su
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.09
Jean Schnadig
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
3.07
Susan Browning
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.96
Kristi Tompkins
published 3
2.92
Pamela Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.85
Joann Donahue
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Susan Douglas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-06-23Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesPamela Hughes / Kendra Rothert vs Catherine Leedy / Cara Liu3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Browning / Susan Douglas vs Rico McIver / Kim Wright6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJoann Donahue / Josette Zervic vs Barbra Jorgensen / Nancy Williams6-1, 6-3
2024-06-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesGarrene Mcgale / Kendra Rothert vs Cathy Cervantez / Gretchen Newcomb6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJean Schnadig vs Elizabeth Arwood6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Browning / Josette Zervic vs Lyudmila Leissler / Rose Lee6-4, 6-2
2024-05-31Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesPamela Hughes / Kendra Rothert vs Julie Trujillo / Rebecca Harris6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHaihua Su vs Lucila Griesser6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJane King Ayers / Susan Douglas vs Rozita Walsh / Nicole Vedder6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Osborne / Josette Zervic vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-25Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesJean Schnadig / Jane King Ayers vs Loo Yah Leong / Anita Rockwell6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHaihua Su / Susan Browning vs Jen Lewis / Cara Williams6-2, 6-3
2024-05-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesPamela Hughes / Susan Browning vs Tina Prassas / Vivian Nguyen6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKendra Rothert vs Marie Dorsey6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesHaihua Su / Joann Donahue vs Edwardeen Hilts / Saki Newman6-3, 6-0
2024-04-26Lost 0–3
L#1 SinglesPamela Hughes vs Yukiko Namba6-4, 5-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Douglas / Rachel Nies vs Kathleen Murrin / Margo Yohner7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJean Schnadig / Jane King Ayers vs Mary Jesse / Megan Heyworth6-4, 6-0
2024-04-21Split 1–1
W#1 SinglesPamela Hughes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJoann Donahue / Josette Zervic vs Julie Carmena / Trylla Lembke7-6, 6-2
2024-04-13Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesGarrene Mcgale / Susan Browning vs Lorna Goth / Tammy LaFrazia6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHaihua Su vs Lauren Holloway6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJean Schnadig / Rachel Nies vs Kieu Lam / Karen Pickering6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKendra Rothert / Jane King Ayers vs Heidi Kjos / Ericka Nelson6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Lisa Cohns
17W–25L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Josette Zervic
64W–53L career
2%98%0%
3.18
3.5
Kendra Rothert
46W–56L career
4%96%0%
3.18
3.5
Haihua Su
88W–65L career
5%95%0%
3.14
3
Jean Schnadig
43W–40L career
0%56%44%
3.09
3
Susan Browning
45W–42L career
0%60%40%
3.07
3
Kristi Tompkins
67W–79L career · type A
0%88%12%
2.96
3
Pamela Hughes
22W–36L career
0%92%8%
2.92
3
Joann Donahue
23W–41L career
0%95%4%
2.85
3
Susan Douglas
23W–32L career
3%97%0%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.