Teams

Midtown - Nunez

2022 Broward Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.14 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-21vs Piccolo - SanabriaLost 02
L#1 DoublesShamena Khan / Mario Correa vs Alida Gutierrez / Ruben Ojeda2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaritza Craig / Syyed Khan vs Cheryl Smith / JUAN SANABRIA4-6, 2-6
2022-06-07vs Veltri -Chen/BrillLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaritza Craig / Syyed Khan vs Liliana Arbelaez / Jose Muriel5-7, 0-6
2022-06-02vs Veltri -Chen/BrillLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndres Intriago / Shamena Khan vs Jose Muriel / NING YAN4-6, 5-7
2022-05-31vs Broward/Midtown - PradoLost 01
L#3 DoublesShamena Khan / Eduardo Lancara vs Jorge Alejandro Romo / Linda Horta3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-05-24vs Veltri - GoldsteinLost 01
L#1 DoublesSyyed Khan / Maritza Craig vs Mary Goldstein / Joe Goldstein2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-17vs Piccolo - SanabriaLost 01
L#1 DoublesAna Milano / Syyed Khan vs Alida Gutierrez / Ruben Ojeda5-7, 1-6
2022-04-26vs Broward/Midtown - PradoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesNuruddin Lakhani / Ana Milano vs JUAN GARCIA / MARIANA DURANTE2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesShamena Khan / Mario Correa vs Mel Tejada / Paloma Seminario7-5, 6-0
2022-04-19vs Veltri - GoldsteinWon 10
W#2 DoublesEduardo Lancara / Shamena Khan vs Melissa Morim / Eli Morim6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Mario Correa
published
3.14
ESPERANZA STILLO
published 3.5
3.14
Juan Yang
published
3.10
EMILIO STILLO
published 3.5
3.02
Shamena Khan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.93
Andres Intriago
published 3
2.87
Ana Milano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Maritza Craig
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Eduardo Lancara
published 3
Syyed Khan
published
William Krinickas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ESPERANZA STILLO + EMILIO STILLO033 matchesnot enough data
Ana Milano + Andres Intriago303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mario Correa
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
ESPERANZA STILLO
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Juan Yang
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.14
3.5
EMILIO STILLO
6W–22L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Shamena Khan
133W–140L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Andres Intriago
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Ana Milano
90W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Maritza Craig
113W–117L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Eduardo Lancara
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Syyed Khan
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
William Krinickas
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.