Teams

Lambert/40/7.5/CWN/GACC

2026 NO Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night · 7.5 NO (40&O) Women Night

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 21 7:00 PM
Green Acres Country Club
Sep 29 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Oct 7 7:00 PM
Green Acres Country Club
2026-08-31vs Tafaro/Forster/40/7.5/CWN/CPLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristy Dupre / Elizabeth Charvat vs Rebel Daigle Salsbury / Jennifer Perilloux6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeather Grant / Vicky Laborde vs Lauren Tafaro / Kallen Forster0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie McMichael / Stacy Vollenweider vs Mary Peters / Kristy Gentry4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.5 NO (40&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fallahi-Teesdale/40/7.5/CWN/CP000000
2Lambert/40/7.5/CWN/GACC000000
3Nguyen/40/7.5/CWN/TTRC000000
4Tafaro/Forster/40/7.5/CWN/CP000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Heather Grant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Barbora Favret
published 4
3.92
Christy Dupre
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Elizabeth Charvat
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Jen Staley
published
3.46
Leslie McMichael
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Jaime Lambert
published
3.28
Stacy Vollenweider
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Jenny Stone
published
3.21
Vicky Laborde
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Katy Wittmann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Jimi Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Stone + Leslie McMichael5259% games+9.3% vs expected
Christy Dupre + Barbora Favret3265% games+4.5% vs expected
Vicky Laborde + Stacy Vollenweider5255% games−7.6% vs expected
Jenny Stone + Jaime Lambert2343% games−9.4% vs expected
Katy Wittmann + Leslie McMichael314 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Stone + Jen Staley404 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Stone + Elizabeth Charvat123 matchesnot enough data
Vicky Laborde + Leslie McMichael303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Grant
32W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
Barbora Favret
30W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Christy Dupre
42W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
Elizabeth Charvat
62W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Jen Staley
36W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Leslie McMichael
64W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Jaime Lambert
46W–30L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Stacy Vollenweider
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Jenny Stone
44W–35L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Vicky Laborde
21W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Katy Wittmann
13W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Jimi Lee
10W–33L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.