Teams

LBK Club Gutridge

2022 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Weekday · 3.5 W Thursday

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-28Won 10
W#1 SinglesAnn Miklas vs Fanny Younger6-3, 6-2
2022-04-21Won 10
W#1 SinglesAnn Miklas vs Judith Hynes7-6, 6-2
2022-04-14vs LWR LloydLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnn Miklas vs Nia Esposito3-6, 3-6
2022-04-07Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAnn Miklas vs Debbie Mays2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Ann Miklas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Cyn Gillespie
published 3.5
3.18
Carol Kalikow
published 3.5
3.05
Laura Shapard
published
Ann Fangue
published
Jana Bekavac
published
Kimberley Wilson
published
Malgorzata Pilch
published
Marcia Gutridge
published
Michelle Harkins
published
Susan Pluss
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Miklas + Kimberley Wilson5160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Miklas
109W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Cyn Gillespie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Carol Kalikow
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Laura Shapard
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Ann Fangue
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jana Bekavac
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberley Wilson
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Malgorzata Pilch
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marcia Gutridge
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Harkins
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Pluss
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.