Teams

CSU GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-02vs LVTALost 01
L#3 DoublesDarla Beutler / Konnie Kosek vs Trish Lebsack / Amy Dykstal7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2021-06-25vs TAG REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesKonnie Kosek / Dee Woodcock vs Helen Dungan / Helen Crews3-6, 0-6
2021-06-11vs CSU GOLDWon 10
W#3 DoublesKonnie Kosek / Darla Beutler vs Terry Poynter / Mary Jane Bartley7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-28vs LVTALost 01
L#3 DoublesKonnie Kosek / Dee Woodcock vs Trish Lebsack / Linda Miller3-6, 5-7
2021-05-21vs TAG REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKonnie Kosek / Pat Murphy-Ebersole vs Laurie Anderson / Helen Crews2-6, 5-7
2021-05-14vs TAG TURQOUISELost 01
L#2 DoublesKonnie Kosek / Pat Murphy-Ebersole vs Priscilla Dressen / Debra Netzel4-6, 5-7
2021-04-30vs FCCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Beth McCubbin / Konnie Kosek vs Melinda Blatt / Dierdre Sadeh3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Dee Woodcock
published 4
3.55
Wendy Schaffer
published
3.24
Darla Beutler
published 3.5
3.22
Lori Loeb
published
3.11
Konnie Kosek
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
D'Ann Rhoda
published
Karen Chancellor
published
Mary Beth McCubbin
published
Pat Murphy-Ebersole
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Konnie Kosek + Pat Murphy-Ebersole2348% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Schaffer + Dee Woodcock033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dee Woodcock
13W–22L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.72
Wendy Schaffer
27W–60L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Darla Beutler
11W–9L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Lori Loeb
45W–26L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Konnie Kosek
34W–77L career · 13 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
D'Ann Rhoda
1W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Chancellor
7W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Beth McCubbin
1W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Pat Murphy-Ebersole
8W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.