← Teams

THPRD-Bennett

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 2.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Frank Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Richard Nobleman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.81
Masafumi Inoue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Keith Westrum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Terrence Trausch
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.70
Norman Langston
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.65
Lee Kriebaum
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.52
Douglas Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.51
George Scott
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Results7 ties
2022-11-20Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesGeorge Scott / Norman Langston vs Stephen Galati / Kevin Grant6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Short / Lee Kriebaum vs Lee Anderson / Dave Sato1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRichard Nobleman / Douglas Bennett vs James King / Steve Elmer6-2, 6-2
2022-11-13Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKeith Westrum / Frank Brown vs Dirk Jacobs / Tony Hitter2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGeorge Scott / Norman Langston vs Ryan Owens / Wes Milligan6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTerrence Trausch / Douglas Bennett vs Scott Quinn / Robert Hesslink6-1, 6-4
2022-10-30Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesFrank Brown / Keith Westrum vs Rex Smith / Tom Finnerty6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNorman Langston / George Scott vs James Prouty / Mitchell Todd4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDouglas Bennett / Richard Nobleman vs Reza Kalantari / Keibun Hayashi6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2022-10-23Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKeith Westrum / Richard Nobleman vs Fenn Bourland / Robert Bennett-Hanes4-6, 5-5
L#2 DoublesGeorge Scott / Norman Langston vs Michael McNulty / Andrew Smith6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTerrence Trausch / Douglas Bennett vs Zachary Wright / Fred Buller6-1, 6-0
2022-10-16Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDouglas Bennett / George Scott vs David Huang / Octavian Tudorache6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNorman Langston / Richard Nobleman vs Steven Grant / DeWayne Ledbetter6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLee Kriebaum / Terrence Trausch vs Jonathan Guinn / Alex Delarosa6-3, 6-1
2022-10-08Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKeith Westrum / Terrence Trausch vs Dave Gillard / Kerry Sweet7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNorman Langston / Richard Nobleman vs Larry Butrick / William Place6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Short / Lee Kriebaum vs Scott Mandel / Eli Lamb6-3, 7-5
2022-09-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesFrank Brown / Masafumi Inoue vs Michael McTague / William Seidl6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJohn Short / Terrence Trausch vs Paul Best / Lars Kasch7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLee Kriebaum / Douglas Bennett vs Kenneth Carter / Michael Hochstatter6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Frank Brown
115W–69L career
0%20%80%
3.21
3
Richard Nobleman
51W–36L career
0%87%13%
2.96
3
Masafumi Inoue
98W–92L career
1%95%3%
2.81
3
Keith Westrum
60W–52L career
2%97%1%
2.76
3
Terrence Trausch
25W–50L career
2%98%0%
2.73
3
Norman Langston
28W–53L career
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Lee Kriebaum
27W–34L career
8%92%0%
2.65
2.5
Douglas Bennett
67W–119L career
0%28%72%
2.52
3
George Scott
26W–78L career
35%65%0%
2.51

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.