Teams

Sugar Creek (Elaine Nash)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 55 & Over Women · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-05vs USTA Atlanta/Carolyn WilsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesElaine Nash / Valerie Williams vs Lucinda Merriweather / Carolyn Wilson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFaye French / Cathy Hampton vs Beth Smith / Robin Mason4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Shelton / Gayle Weaks vs Sylvia Ware / Sharon Jordan3-6, 1-6
2025-11-03vs Rockdale TC (Marianne Boehringer)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCathy Hampton / Valerie Williams vs Sonnia Stoveall / Deborah Wilson0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSylvia Baker / Peggy Shelton vs Tiffany Baines / Merrilee Carlin1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Bacote / Faye French vs Marianne Boehringer / Betty Hicks0-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesSheryl Burke / Valerie Williams vs Marsha Johnson / Icilma Morton2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnnie Canty / Sylvia Baker vs Lynette Wilson-Phillips / Margaret Hill6-7, 1-6
2025-10-15vs Four Seasons (Debra Shannon)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSheryl Burke / Elaine Nash vs Connie Fisher / Lu Anne Manry2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesFaye French / Sylvia Baker vs Nancy Briscoe / Denise Price0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Shelton / Synceria Jones vs Barbara O'Brien / Sue Rhoden1-6, 1-6
2025-10-08vs Hudlow (Kathy Lewis)*Split 11
W#1 DoublesKim J King / Sheryl Burke vs Donna Brisse / Becky Seay6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnnie Canty / Peggy Shelton vs Betsy Edwards / Theresa ODonnell5-7, 7-6, 7-6
2025-10-01vs USTA Atlanta/Carolyn WilsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesCathy Hampton / Valerie Williams vs Valerie Blakely / Carolyn Wilson4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFaye French / Lisa Bacote vs Sarah Head / Robin Mason2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Shelton / Gayle Weaks vs Jacquelyn McKellar / Tammie Harrison2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings19 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/Gloria Parr7017411139
2Glenbrooke (Lynne Anthony)*601538111
3USTA Atlanta/Carolyn Wilson5114411127
4Rockdale TC (Marianne Boehringer)*5113514149
5Harrison (Elise Bishop)*5113516178
6West Georgia Tennis Club (Lisa Hogan)*5111716172
7USTA Atlanta/Yvonne Krauter5216514166
8West Georgia (Pamela Cole)*4213513143
9Fowler Park (Zarrin Hagan)*4213513156
10Four Seasons (Debra Shannon)*4212615173
11Saddle Creek (Lin Sherbinski)*3310819180
12Harrison (Christina Reeder)*2461225192
13Brookfield CC (Heather Sinclair)*2451328198
14Fowler Park (Cody Anne Moss)*1551328204
15Sugar Creek (Elaine Nash)*1521632207
16TPC Sugarloaf (Sandy Elliot)*1671431255
17Mayfair/St Clair (Vicky Passaglia)*1661531220
18Mayfair/St. Clair (Dawn Lockwood)*1651635243
19Hudlow (Kathy Lewis)*0631531220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Sheryl Burke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Annie Canty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Faye French
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Cathy Hampton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Kim J King
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Gayle Weaks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Sylvia Baker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Peggy Shelton
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.49
Lisa Bacote
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.47
Synceria Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elaine Nash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim J King + Sheryl Burke224 matchesnot enough data
Gayle Weaks + Peggy Shelton033 matchesnot enough data
Gayle Weaks + Kim J King303 matchesnot enough data
Faye French + Cathy Hampton123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Bacote + Kim J King213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheryl Burke
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Annie Canty
16W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
Faye French
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Cathy Hampton
28W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
2.92
Kim J King
27W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Gayle Weaks
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Sylvia Baker
5W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
Peggy Shelton
3W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
Lisa Bacote
5W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Synceria Jones
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
Elaine Nash
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.