Teams

JTC Ferguson

2024 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-01vs Alachua/Yonge/18&Over6.5MLost 01
L#3 DoublesKevin Laird / Jorge Torres-Vazquez vs Andrew Lewis / Ed Stark1-6, 6-7
2024-11-17vs WS Punchers (Saracino)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDan Harloff / Kewei Xu vs Peng Shi / Alex Andueza6-1, 6-0
2024-11-01vs 300 SmithWon 10
W#2 DoublesNelson Brunsting / Robert Tangeman vs HEE-SUNG BAE / Steven Smith6-2, 6-2
2024-10-27vs WS Punchers (Saracino)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDan Harloff / Enrique Vargas vs Giuseppe Saracino / Diwakar Vyas6-2, 6-0
2024-10-25vs Alachua/Yonge/18&Over6.5MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKevin Laird / Jorge Torres-Vazquez vs Ed Stark / Paul Wesson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Tangeman / Florian Bardy vs Thomas Yonge / Gabriel Gomez4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-10-13vs 300 SmithLost 01
L#3 DoublesAly Harlan / Kewei Xu vs Jian Pu / Jonathan Taffe3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Nelson Brunsting
published
3.44
Pranav Gupta
published
3.36
Enrique Vargas
published
3.32
Dan Harloff
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Austin Manning
published 3.5
3.23
Kevin Smith
published
3.11
Kewei Xu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Robert Tangeman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.84
Jorge Torres-Vazquez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Kevin Laird
published
Timothy Ferguson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jorge Torres-Vazquez + Dan Harloff224 matchesnot enough data
Enrique Vargas + Pranav Gupta303 matchesnot enough data
Pranav Gupta + Dan Harloff123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nelson Brunsting
24W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
Pranav Gupta
23W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
3.44
Enrique Vargas
32W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Dan Harloff
100W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Austin Manning
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Smith
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Kewei Xu
53W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Robert Tangeman
146W–71L career · 2 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Jorge Torres-Vazquez
162W–139L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Kevin Laird
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Ferguson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.