Teams

SC-Middle Skittles

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-11-06vs WRAC-WoodwardLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet Deandre / Lisa Dumais vs Debra Miller / Brenda Dunn6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRoberta Knorr / Donna Evans vs Ellen Lester / Laurie Luckman Adams4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDawn Worrall / Mary Schafer vs Elizabeth Linnell / Maureen Woodward1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-11-06vs YTC-DonahueWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Deandre / Lisa Dumais vs Audrey James / Cynthia Kimel6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTeesha Clark / Janice Leitner vs Michele Donahue / Becky Melcher4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDawn Worrall / Mary Schafer vs Lesley Kerns / Jody Snyder0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-11-05vs CBRC-NewsomWon 30
W#1 DoublesRoberta Knorr / Donna Evans vs Joann Bunch / Theresa Koehler6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTeesha Clark / Janice Leitner vs Monica Gehrke / Kathy Walker6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Deandre / Lisa Dumais vs Jan Hanami / Sidney Newsom6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YTC-Donahue2163773
2SC-Middle Skittles2163862
3CBRC-Cooley21541184
4WRAC-Woodward21541284
5IND-Tri-State Warriors WIM12451078

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Janet Deandre
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dawn Worrall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Donna Evans
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Teesha Clark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Janice Leitner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Mary Schafer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Dumais
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roberta Knorr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Deandre + Lisa Dumais11360% games+0.7% vs expected
Donna Evans + Roberta Knorr252252% games−5.5% vs expected
Janice Leitner + Teesha Clark4445% games−6.2% vs expected
Dawn Worrall + Mary Schafer5649% games−7.2% vs expected
Lisa Dumais + Janice Leitner6844% games−10.0% vs expected
Janet Deandre + Teesha Clark4356% gamesnot enough data
Mary Schafer + Janice Leitner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Janet Deandre
72W–66L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Dawn Worrall
19W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Donna Evans
29W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Teesha Clark
70W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Janice Leitner
35W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Mary Schafer
20W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.91
Lisa Dumais
31W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Roberta Knorr
28W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.