Teams

MacCall

2025 South East Tennis Singles 55 & Over League · 3.5 Men 55 & over

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-17vs Pelczar Compass PointSplit 11
W#2 SinglesDoug MacCall vs Franklin Cassada6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesScott Dotson vs David Paul4-6, 1-6
2025-02-15vs KyselyLost 02
L#1 SinglesFred Broyles vs Adrian Willis4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesEdward Pringle vs Gregor Kysely1-6, 3-6
2025-02-05vs KyselySplit 11
W#2 SinglesDoug MacCall vs Michael Scordato6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesFred Broyles vs Dale Benson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-02-01vs Pelczar Compass PointSplit 11
L#2 SinglesEdward Pringle vs Franklin Cassada7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBrian Grozbean vs Michael Gould6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-01vs KyselyLost 12
W#1 SinglesDoug MacCall vs Gregor Kysely6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTimothy O'Connor vs Adrian Willis2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesScott Dotson vs Michael Scordato6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-20vs Pelczar Compass PointWon 21
L#1 SinglesFred Broyles vs Tim Pelczar1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesDoug MacCall vs David Paul6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesBrian Grozbean vs Michael Gould6-3, 6-1
2025-01-15vs KyselyLost 12
L#1 SinglesTimothy O'Connor vs Michael Scordato1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesDavid Odell vs Peter Weppler6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesScott Dotson vs Gregor Kysely1-6, 0-6
2025-01-11vs Pelczar Compass PointWon 20
W#2 SinglesFred Broyles vs BRUCE MILLER3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesEdward Pringle vs Franklin Cassada1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men 55 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
David Odell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Doug MacCall
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Edward Pringle
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Brian Grozbean
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Fred Broyles
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
3.15
Timothy O'Connor
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.78
Scott Dotson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Dotson + Doug MacCall123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Odell
21W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Doug MacCall
40W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Edward Pringle
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Brian Grozbean
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Fred Broyles
41W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.21
Timothy O'Connor
8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.15
Scott Dotson
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.