Teams

Domanski

2025 Hampton Roads Adult 40 & Over · Hampton Roads Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.94 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-23vs KezmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesEstela Reid / Donna Donato vs Courtney Kellam / Michella Newton6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristina Prock vs Julie Soriano0-6, 4-6
2025-07-14vs Hoffman-SchmitzLost 12
W#1 DoublesBetty Domanski / Laura McMahon vs Rebecca Hoover / Stacey Shiflet3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Zigrang / Christina Prock vs Jessica Hoffman-Schmitz / Joan Corkery7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCindy Aston / Diane Osborne Yates vs Mary Snowden-Gordon / Rebecca Newton6-7, 2-6
2025-07-09vs Team LegumWon 20
W#1 DoublesCindy Aston / Gaye Benson vs Alyse Chickey / Elizabeth Peterson5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBetty Domanski / Katie LeGrande vs Suzanne Mihlon / Lisa Deaver2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-02vs CamdenWon 20
W#2 DoublesChristina Bartholomew / Estela Reid vs Shannon Halter / Beth Anderson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesYuli Reams / Laura McMahon vs Tammy Willett / Mary Broome6-0, 6-0
2025-06-25vs Hoffman-SchmitzWon 40
W#1 DoublesYuli Reams / Cheryl Zigrang vs Joan Corkery / Jessica Hoffman-Schmitz6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesChristina Prock vs Suzanne Birdsong6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Donato / Estela Reid vs Lauren Kiger / Stacey Shiflet6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBetty Domanski / Laura McMahon vs Kathryn Fraim / Carrie Coleman6-0, 6-1
2025-06-18vs KezmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristina Bartholomew / Rebecca Greenwald vs Courtney Kellam / Katherine Creedon3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Aston / Yuli Reams vs Tessa Robinson / Carrie Yuill6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Prock / Laura McMahon vs Courtney Violette / Tijen Ireland4-6, 1-6
2025-06-16vs CamdenWon 21
W#1 DoublesEstela Reid / Yuli Reams vs Paige Caporicci / Beth Anderson6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChristina Bartholomew vs Laurin Haupt6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKelly Long / Gaye Benson vs Laura Smith / Mary Campen6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-04vs Team LegumWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Bartholomew / Donna Donato vs Suzanne Mihlon / Lori Cox6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Aston / Gaye Benson vs Alyse Chickey / Elizabeth Peterson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBetty Domanski / Yuli Reams vs Kristina Chastain / Sheridan Conley6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Yuli Reams
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.95
Kelly Long
published
3.90
Christina Bartholomew
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.85
Betty Domanski
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Gaye Benson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Cindy Aston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Katie LeGrande
published
3.60
Estela Reid
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Christina Prock
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.58
Cheryl Zigrang
published 4
3.34
Laura McMahon
published
3.17
Diane Osborne Yates
published 3.5
Donna Donato
published
Rebecca Greenwald
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Aston + Betty Domanski4254% games+0.4% vs expected
Cindy Aston + Yuli Reams4552% games−0.4% vs expected
Kelly Long + Betty Domanski3257% games−4.0% vs expected
Yuli Reams + Betty Domanski6259% games−5.1% vs expected
Gaye Benson + Cindy Aston142048% games−5.3% vs expected
Estela Reid + Christina Bartholomew6453% gamesnot enough data
Yuli Reams + Christina Bartholomew5161% gamesnot enough data
Betty Domanski + Christina Bartholomew3252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Yuli Reams
119W–54L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
Kelly Long
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Christina Bartholomew
84W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Betty Domanski
101W–58L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
4
Gaye Benson
21W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Cindy Aston
53W–61L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Katie LeGrande
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Estela Reid
17W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Christina Prock
60W–30L career · 11 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
4
Cheryl Zigrang
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Laura McMahon
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Diane Osborne Yates
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Donna Donato
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Greenwald
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.