Teams

TInga (Lifetime)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.89 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-29vs OBanchik/NO'Brien (Life Time)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAvani Bhamidipati / Reshmi Santhosh vs Naomi O'Brien / Madelaine LeBlanc1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLuz Lim / Kate Lauren vs Olya Banchik / Laura Pratt3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJasmine Fontaine / Tania Inga vs Sun Moon / Annika Leintz2-6, 3-6
2025-04-28vs SChandler/NKoesel (Raintree)Lost 04
L#1 DoublesJJ Zhu / Reshmi Santhosh vs Susan Chandler / Niki Koesel2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKate Lauren vs Tricia Shaw4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesXia Xia / Elana Blake vs Julie Klingman / Elizabeth Harvey2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLuz Lim / Tania Inga vs Christine Demille / Sarah Prochaska2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-04-15vs MTurturro (OPRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesAnait Balasanyan / Avani Bhamidipati vs Punky Brick / Janet Newton6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKate Lauren vs Stacey Valitchka6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Jo Mastrangelo / JJ Zhu vs Eileen Jones / Mary Turturro2-6, 1-6
2025-04-08vs CLogar/RRiechelmann (WSRC)Lost 04
L#1 DoublesLuz Lim / Reshmi Santhosh vs Renata Riechelmann / Rhonda Tate6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLinda Jo Mastrangelo vs Heidi Casey1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesXia Xia / Ashley Pitt vs Martha Lowman / Randi Trojan1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJJ Zhu / Elana Blake vs Christine Rasmussen / Maryann Whalen6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-25vs VTolson/KPetras (Firethorne)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKate Lauren / Luz Lim vs Caroline Lattanzi / Kristen Petras2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesXia Xia / Tania Inga vs Courtney Slavin / Danielle Fricke3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnait Balasanyan / Avani Bhamidipati vs Renu Renu Gill / Beth Godfrey4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-18vs VShannon (Raintree)Won 31
W#1 DoublesKate Lauren / Luz Lim vs Winnie Simmons / Theresa Joiner6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLinda Jo Mastrangelo vs Vicky Shannon6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTania Inga / Jasmine Fontaine vs Adriana Hall / Jenny Carlson6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAvani Bhamidipati / Sharon Sullivan vs Alexis Schwartz / Angela Thomas6-3, 7-6
2025-03-11vs YSmith (Mason Wallace)Won 31
W#1 DoublesJasmine Fontaine / Tania Inga vs Lynsey Weber / Carolyn Henderson6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnait Balasanyan vs Bridget Megginson6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAshley Pitt / Avani Bhamidipati vs Kate MacRone / Yukiko Cooper0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesElana Blake / JJ Zhu vs Christine Zetts / Jan Albright6-3, 6-2
2025-03-04vs SHerndon/SStaley (WSRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTania Inga / Jasmine Fontaine vs Stacey Herndon / Kimberly Borans3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLuz Lim / Kate Lauren vs Sally Blocksom / Heather Taylor1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnait Balasanyan / Avani Bhamidipati vs Tasha Cooper / Mary Wolf2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Anait Balasanyan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.89
Sharon Sullivan
published
2.79
Kate Lauren
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Avani Bhamidipati
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Jasmine Fontaine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Luz Lim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Tania Inga
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Reshmi Santhosh
published
2.67
Xia Xia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.56
Linda Jo Mastrangelo
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.40
JJ Zhu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.37
Elana Blake
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jasmine Fontaine + Tania Inga121747% games−0.1% vs expected
Avani Bhamidipati + Anait Balasanyan10554% gamesnot enough data
Kate Lauren + Xia Xia4255% gamesnot enough data
Luz Lim + Kate Lauren2349% gamesnot enough data
Luz Lim + Tania Inga3259% gamesnot enough data
Linda Jo Mastrangelo + Tania Inga2343% gamesnot enough data
Tania Inga + Xia Xia2343% gamesnot enough data
Jasmine Fontaine + Anait Balasanyan314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anait Balasanyan
56W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Sharon Sullivan
10W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Kate Lauren
41W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Avani Bhamidipati
32W–35L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Jasmine Fontaine
50W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Luz Lim
49W–68L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Tania Inga
46W–63L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Reshmi Santhosh
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
2.5
Xia Xia
44W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%12%88%
2.67
2.5
Linda Jo Mastrangelo
23W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
3
JJ Zhu
28W–67L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.40
Elana Blake
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.