Teams

Kiwi - Jordan

2023 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-01vs Titans - MarattaWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathi Heller / Cheri McLachlan vs Sylvia Segura / Linda Stout6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-03-27vs Titans - MarattaWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathi Heller / Cheri McLachlan vs Sylvia Segura / Suzanne New7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Barlow / Karin Mann vs Naomi Coleman / Licci Barham6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Wynne / Amy Behm vs Megan Magill / Amy McIntosh3-6, 4-6
2023-03-25vs Brevard/Wolszczak/40&Over4.0WLost 01
L#1 SinglesDawn Barlow vs Melissa Johnson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-04vs Brevard/Wolszczak/40&Over4.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesDawn Barlow / Dianne Harrington-Gocek vs Rima Campbell / Debbie Sibley6-3, 2-3
2023-02-18vs Titans - MarattaLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoyce Hayes / Cheri McLachlan vs Naomi Coleman / Tanya Molony6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-02-11vs Brevard/Wolszczak/40&Over4.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatti van Zante / Dianne Harrington-Gocek vs Debbie Sibley / Susan Noble2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDawn Barlow / Cheri McLachlan vs Melissa Johnson / Joni Smith6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-01-28vs Titans - MarattaWon 10
W#2 DoublesCheri McLachlan / Bobbi Allebach vs Cristina Engel / Linda Stout6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-01-21vs Brevard/Wolszczak/40&Over4.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheri McLachlan / Dianne Harrington-Gocek vs Joni Smith / Kileen Knight3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Dawn Barlow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Bobbi Allebach
published 4
3.63
Karen Wynne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Cheri McLachlan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Kimberly Farson
published
Maite Harte
published
Patti van Zante
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheri McLachlan + Dawn Barlow2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dawn Barlow
95W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
4.13
4
Bobbi Allebach
6W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Karen Wynne
20W–21L career · 1 line in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Cheri McLachlan
158W–138L career · 6 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Kimberly Farson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maite Harte
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patti van Zante
26W–24L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.