Teams

6 Hermitage Lines

2023 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-28vs 10 Raintree HeinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Douglas Lines vs Shannon Foster / Dwarkesh Shah6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-16vs 1 Twin Hickory Saxena Hit & RunWon 20
W#2 DoublesAMY LINES / Douglas Lines vs Shalini Saxena / Bhavneet Sarna6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Gray Booker vs Sugandha Agarwal / Sumit Kumar6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-26vs 9 Avalon GhitaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAMY LINES / Douglas Lines vs Sarah Hobgood / Kristopher Johnson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Gray Booker vs Marineth Kight / Chris Haberlin6-2, 7-5
2023-05-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Ralph Whitt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
AMY LINES
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.46
Stephanie Yablonski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Turner Broughton
published
3.16
Lauren Hutcheson
published
3.14
Kimberly Ross
published
3.00
Gray Booker
published
2.98
Stacey Haug
published
2.90
Corey Booker
published 3
2.69
Douglas Lines
published
2.67
Alison Chesson
published 3
Jospeh Ross
published
Ralph Whitt
published
Rob Chesson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

AMY LINES + Douglas Lines3450% games−3.8% vs expected
Kimberly Ross + Jospeh Ross123 matchesnot enough data
Gray Booker + Corey Booker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
219W–86L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.96
3.5
Stephanie Yablonski
124W–85L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Turner Broughton
27W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Lauren Hutcheson
21W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.16
Kimberly Ross
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
Gray Booker
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
Stacey Haug
20W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Corey Booker
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
Douglas Lines
14W–24L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Alison Chesson
12W–21L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67
Jospeh Ross
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ralph Whitt
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rob Chesson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.