Teams

Hills/K. Armagost/Combo50&Over8.5W

2023 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 8.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.12 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-12vs HCC-Halstead/SheridanWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeticia Leppert / Lisa Freeman vs Marie Teixeira / Jennifer Lewis6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDianne Albina / Janet Karpan vs Jillene Davis / Michele Vogeley4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-11-05vs Davis Island - J. SalmonLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Armagost / Dianne Albina vs Sharon Lore / Margaret Roset0-6, 6-7
2023-10-15vs HCC-Halstead/SheridanWon 10
W#1 DoublesDianne Albina / Lara Slatniske vs Michele Vogeley / Judi Alford2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-10-01vs Davis Island - J. SalmonWon 20
W#1 DoublesDianne Albina / Lara Slatniske vs Tania Biller / Katie Healy6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAngela Bowes / Leticia Leppert vs Lisa Oonk / Michelle Verdisco7-5, 6-3
2023-09-24vs HCC-Halstead/SheridanLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarcy Faircloth / Lara Slatniske vs Lisa Coyne / Deborah Nicklaus3-6, 3-6
2023-09-10vs Davis Island - J. SalmonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLara Cavanaugh / Leticia Leppert vs Tania Biller / Margaret Roset5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKelly Armagost / Dianne Albina vs Sharon Lore / Ann Carlson7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Dianne Albina
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.00
Janet Karpan
published
3.90
Leticia Leppert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.84
Lara Slatniske
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
3.69
Kelly Armagost
published
3.61
Karen Abrams
published
Lisa Freeman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lara Slatniske + Dianne Albina18456% games+4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dianne Albina
96W–56L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.19
Janet Karpan
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Leticia Leppert
211W–99L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Lara Slatniske
130W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Anne-Lucie Bouchard
30W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Kelly Armagost
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Karen Abrams
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
Lisa Freeman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.