Teams

LifeTime Frisco/McDonald M4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S M. League

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-31vs Garland/Amacher M4.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesMark Fuhrer / Jeff Kennedy vs Todd Amacher / James Tobey6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesChuck Lee vs Trenton Slate4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAtul Rajani / Bernard Salvosa vs Ayal Feinberg / David Cantu1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJames Vo / Garold LaRue vs Bob Williams / Kyle Kaigler7-6, 6-3
2025-04-26vs McKinney/Clifton M4.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesJames Vo / Bernard Salvosa vs Praveenkumar Vijayakumar / Pradeep Somasundaram6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMark Fuhrer / Mel Shepherd vs Douglas Wallace / Gary Paparella6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCalvin McDonald / Jeff Kennedy vs Preston Borchelt / David Berman6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S M. League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Tin Trinh
published
3.97
Jeff Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Atul Rajani
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Mark Fuhrer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.93
Gary Sinclair
published
3.80
Calvin McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Chuck Lee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.72
Bernard Salvosa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Alexander Hahn
published 4
3.60
Garold LaRue
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Mel Shepherd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Tony Le
published
James Vo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Kennedy + Calvin McDonald2642% games+1.8% vs expected
Tony Le + Jeff Kennedy044 matchesnot enough data
Mark Fuhrer + Gary Sinclair224 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Kennedy + Gary Sinclair404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tin Trinh
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
4.12
Jeff Kennedy
25W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Atul Rajani
27W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
Mark Fuhrer
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
Gary Sinclair
28W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Calvin McDonald
17W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Chuck Lee
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Bernard Salvosa
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Alexander Hahn
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Garold LaRue
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Mel Shepherd
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Tony Le
18W–22L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
James Vo
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.