Teams

Maloney 55/6.5/M/Pelican

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 55 & Over - Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · Cov Southern Combo 55 & Over - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Arthur 55/6.5/M/StoneCreek60171278
2Maloney 55/6.5/M/Pelican2451328192
3Miller 55/6.5/M/Francos1551327185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
David Oubre
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.53
Dink McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 3
Dennis Boushie Jr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Joe Sheffield
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
John Fournet
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
John Stein
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Kenny Boudreaux
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Mark Maloney
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published
Michael Burdge
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
R Timothy Brown
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Ronnie Cazabon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ronnie Matherne
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Shaoming Lu
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Wayne Songy
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronnie Matherne + Mark Maloney044 matchesnot enough data
Ronnie Cazabon + Kenny Boudreaux033 matchesnot enough data
Dink McCoy + Ronnie Matherne033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Oubre
7W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Dink McCoy
9W–28L career · 18 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.53
2.5
Dennis Boushie Jr
1W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joe Sheffield
4W–9L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Fournet
4W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Stein
1W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kenny Boudreaux
2W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Maloney
6W–27L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Burdge
36W–50L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
R Timothy Brown
20W–33L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronnie Cazabon
4W–25L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronnie Matherne
11W–31L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shaoming Lu
4W–9L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wayne Songy
12W–22L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.