← Teams

PTC-Ouellette/Hill

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Nina Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Colleen Kellogg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Nina Bakos
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Sarah Mutal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Tiffany Bowie
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Reiko Maeda
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Kara Place
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Annette Hill
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Kari Hastings
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.26
Miriam Habafy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Penny Langhammer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Noel Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-03-16Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesColleen Kellogg / Annette Hill vs Heather MacPherson / Emily Vander Ploeg6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNina Bakos vs CHRISTINE McNair6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesReiko Maeda / Miriam Habafy vs Caryn Cohen / Emily Qi6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNoel Thomas / Penny Langhammer vs Chiharu Olsson / Parul Saxena6-1, 6-2
2025-03-01Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesNina Hanson / Kari Hastings vs Michele Beaman / Kyra John6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Ouellette / Noel Thomas vs Sue Edmonds / Jennifer Bane6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAnnette Hill / Colleen Kellogg vs Janet Mills / Jenny Pizot7-6, 6-3
2025-02-22Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesKara Place / Amy Ouellette vs Jane Shu / Lisa Hockman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPenny Langhammer vs Suki Birge6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnnette Hill / Tiffany Bowie vs Crystal Miller / Alison Marr6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNoel Thomas / Sarah Mutal vs Xiaolu Huang / Lauren Smith6-4, 6-1
2025-02-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTiffany Bowie / Reiko Maeda vs Ann Skoog / Christine Steele Smith6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNina Bakos / Amy Ouellette vs Lupine Swanson / Devrie Brennan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Mutal / Noel Thomas vs Christine Moran / Marilyn Sims7-5, 6-2
2025-02-01Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesTiffany Bowie / Nina Hanson vs Becky Holzman / Tove Maloco7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKari Hastings / Reiko Maeda vs Jill Eilers / Janae Pyle4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPenny Langhammer / Miriam Habafy vs Dory Simons / Desiree Bliss6-4, 6-4
2025-01-19Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesColleen Kellogg / Kara Place vs Angie Urrutia / Alison Marr6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesReiko Maeda vs Jinquan Wu6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMiriam Habafy / Kari Hastings vs Tomoko Hori / Lauren Smith6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSarah Mutal / Penny Langhammer vs Sandi Martes / Jackie Konen6-1, 6-2
2025-01-11Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesTiffany Bowie / Kari Hastings vs Ruth Semon / Monica Christensen7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNina Bakos vs Alexandra MacDonald6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPenny Langhammer / Kara Place vs Eliza Oh / Julie Trujillo6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSarah Mutal / Annette Hill vs Melanie DeSilva / Shella Razon-Lumetta7-5, 6-0
2025-01-04Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesColleen Kellogg / Nina Hanson vs Diana Callaway / Kim Wright6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesReiko Maeda vs Gretchen Wagner6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMiriam Habafy / Penny Langhammer vs Alison Davis / Laura Laney6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTiffany Bowie / Annette Hill vs Nancy Williams / Wendy Whitsell6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nina Hanson
110W–57L career
4%96%0%
3.69
3.5
Colleen Kellogg
65W–69L career
0%81%19%
3.50
3.5
Nina Bakos
42W–24L career
0%90%10%
3.43
3.5
Sarah Mutal
55W–34L career
0%94%6%
3.42
3.5
Tiffany Bowie
95W–68L career
0%94%6%
3.41
3.5
Reiko Maeda
76W–78L career
0%98%2%
3.35
3.5
Kara Place
41W–25L career
1%97%2%
3.31
3.5
Annette Hill
62W–69L career
0%98%1%
3.30
3.5
Kari Hastings
88W–75L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Miriam Habafy
105W–82L career
0%99%0%
3.26
3.5
Penny Langhammer
61W–36L career
2%97%0%
3.22
3
Noel Thomas
7W–8L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.