← Teams

THPRD-Egger/Pham

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.7 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Mary Green-Zwemke
published 4.5
3.85
David Pham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Vincent Lee
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.62
Barbara Dusicka
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Heike Droste
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Matt Thayer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Potter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Patty Chen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Hoover Li
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Hien Lu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2021-12-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJennifer Potter / David Pham vs Adam Oken / Cindy del Rosario6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBarbara Dusicka / Vincent Lee vs Jonathan Hong / Joyce Wang6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHoover Li / Heike Droste vs Michael Cheng / Kalynn Belden6-2, 6-3
2021-11-14Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMary Green-Zwemke / Hien Lu vs Jason Hyde / Michelle Beilstein7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPatty Chen / Kok Waii Wong vs Dan Bingham / Hong Allen6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHoover Li / Heike Droste vs David Vedder / Amy Thomas6-1, 6-0
2021-11-07Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesDavid Pham / Jennifer Potter vs Amy Bucher / Jeff DeVall3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Green-Zwemke / Matt Thayer vs Patricia Board / John van Leeuwen7-6, 6-4
2021-10-29Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesBarbara Dusicka / Michael Davis vs Sarah Robertson / Brian McDonagh6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPatty Chen / Hoover Li vs Christian Buchholz / Raimund Grube6-2, 7-5
2021-10-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMary Green-Zwemke / Hoover Li vs Jeff Legassick / Julie Legassick6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLala Climaco / Hien Lu vs Kristie Leake / Michael Sullivan2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Potter / Kok Waii Wong vs Robin Fernstrom / Peter Brandenburger4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-10-10Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLala Climaco / Matt Thayer vs Amy Thomas / David Vedder6-4, 6-4
2021-09-19Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesVincent Lee / Laurie Horenstein vs Vivek Mano / Felicia Phillips6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatty Chen / Hoover Li vs Brendan Adamczyk / Debbie Frankel6-2, 6-2
2021-09-12Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesLala Climaco / Hien Lu vs Celene Robert / Saurabh Chauhan - *6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Potter / David Pham vs Kalynn Belden / Michael Cheng1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Dusicka / Vincent Lee vs Cindy del Rosario / Adam Oken2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Mary Green-Zwemke
79W–32L career
7%93%0%
4.05
4
David Pham
147W–109L career
0%98%2%
3.85
4
Vincent Lee
136W–76L career
5%94%0%
3.68
3.5
Barbara Dusicka
97W–37L career
0%46%54%
3.62
3.5
Heike Droste
158W–91L career
0%89%11%
3.46
3.5
Matt Thayer
91W–63L career
0%94%6%
3.42
3.5
Jennifer Potter
38W–53L career
2%98%1%
3.24
3.5
Patty Chen
59W–56L career
6%94%0%
3.15
3.5
Hoover Li
61W–51L career
18%81%1%
3.12
3.5
Hien Lu
52W–60L career
13%87%0%
3.10

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.