Teams

X18 7.0 LT McKenzie

2025 NEOTA Mixed 18 & Over · NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Mixed

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-19vs X18 7.0 NC1 BullachWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Miller / Alissa McKenzie vs Michelle Ross / Ryan Brahler3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Thomas / Rebekka Hom vs Benjamin Bartholomew / Stephanie Bailey6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Tolva / Megan Ha vs Dee Kelleher / Douglas Bernard6-2, 6-1
2025-06-22vs X18 7.0 NC1 BullachWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristina Reeves / Ryan Garst vs Ashley Bullach / Clayton Cundiff2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChito Lam / Megan Ha vs Kay McHolm / Gabriel McHolm6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlissa McKenzie / Nat Weiner vs Dee Kelleher / Timothy Booher6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA 18&O 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Michael Tolva
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Yechun Fu
published
3.48
Chito Lam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Yasmine Quabili
published
3.40
Donna Balc
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Nat Weiner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Steve Gehring
published
3.30
Jill Diamond
published
3.29
Christina Reeves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Rebekka Hom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Megan Ha
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Ryan Garst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Geoff Fiedler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Alissa McKenzie
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.94
Jennifer Ruggles
published
2.92
Tracy Mathia
published
2.87
Heather Wentz
published
Stuart Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alissa McKenzie + Ryan Garst2351% games+3.8% vs expected
Ryan Garst + Rebekka Hom2349% games+0.2% vs expected
Ryan Garst + Christina Reeves4351% games−1.7% vs expected
Steve Gehring + Jill Diamond4453% games−2.5% vs expected
Steve Gehring + Christina Reeves5249% games−11.6% vs expected
Alissa McKenzie + Geoff Fiedler224 matchesnot enough data
Donna Balc + Geoff Fiedler123 matchesnot enough data
Steve Gehring + Rebekka Hom303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Tolva
44W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.80
Yechun Fu
30W–16L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Chito Lam
35W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Yasmine Quabili
83W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Donna Balc
148W–97L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Nat Weiner
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Steve Gehring
95W–54L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Jill Diamond
131W–71L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Christina Reeves
112W–66L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Rebekka Hom
89W–56L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Megan Ha
78W–57L career · 8 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Ryan Garst
120W–100L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Geoff Fiedler
86W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Alissa McKenzie
138W–120L career · 5 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Jennifer Ruggles
140W–84L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.94
Tracy Mathia
88W–63L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.92
Heather Wentz
95W–65L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Stuart Jackson
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.