Teams

SFT:Spark Blue:Sideman

2022 EMA Adult 40 & Over Men · 3.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesJoe Lichtenberg / Kumar Ponnapalam vs Brad Riley / Scott Burnham5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesWeiwei Shu vs Erik Muench6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJeff Gormady / Shane O'Connor vs Stephen Brown / James McDaniel4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRon Cahill / James White vs Kelly Higgins / David Rowe6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesPeter Schutter / Shane O'Connor vs Kurt Wilhelm / Chuck Anderson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKumar Ponnapalam vs Peter Germond6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Neal / Charles O'Connor vs Rich Alimenti / Paul Swaim0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Vittiglio / Carl Benevides vs Jake Duckworth / CHRIS CHANG6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKumar Ponnapalam / Robert Moccia vs Yan Feng / James McDaniel6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWeiwei Shu vs John Karbassi4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Buttress / Charles O'Connor vs Brad Riley / Scott Burnham0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRon Cahill / Peter Schutter vs Michel VanRavestyn / Kelly Higgins6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesPeter Schutter / Kumar Ponnapalam vs Jeff Kabriel / Chuck Anderson2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesWeiwei Shu vs Vidya Guruju6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Moccia / Jeff Gormady vs Keith Knearem / CHRIS CHANG5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRon Cahill / Shane O'Connor vs Tim McGrath / Jake Duckworth6-4, 6-0
L#1 DoublesPeter Schutter / Joe Lichtenberg vs Stephen Brown / JEFFREY SOLTES3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesWeiwei Shu vs Joel Mittelman7-6, 2-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShane O'Connor / Andrew Buttress vs Scott Burnham / EVERARD HATCH0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Neal / Charles O'Connor vs David Rowe / Erik Muench2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesShane O'Connor / Peter Schutter vs Kurt Wilhelm / Jeff Kabriel5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesWeiwei Shu vs Peter Germond2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAndrew Buttress / James White vs Paul Swaim / Keith Knearem2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Vittiglio / Carl Benevides vs CHRIS CHANG / Jake Duckworth3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SFT:Spark Green:Higgins/van Ravestyn062139133
2BRTC:Bass River Green Goblins:Alimenti06101432248
3SFT:Spark Blue:Sideman0651940261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Evan Sideman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Adam Molda
published 4
2.88
Shane O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.84
Jeff Gormady
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Carl Benevides
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Charles O'Connor
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Andrew Buttress
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joe Lichtenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Neal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Joseph Vittiglio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kumar Ponnapalam
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Peter Schutter
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Robert Moccia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ron Cahill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Weiwei Shu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shane O'Connor + Jeff Gormady1452% games+8.2% vs expected
Joseph Vittiglio + Carl Benevides0538% games−7.6% vs expected
Kumar Ponnapalam + Robert Moccia0533% gamesnot enough data
Charles O'Connor + John Neal134 matchesnot enough data
Charles O'Connor + Andrew Buttress033 matchesnot enough data
John Neal + Joseph Vittiglio033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Evan Sideman
75W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
4.46
4
Adam Molda
29W–23L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shane O'Connor
27W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Jeff Gormady
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Carl Benevides
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Charles O'Connor
6W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Andrew Buttress
1W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joe Lichtenberg
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
John Neal
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Vittiglio
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kumar Ponnapalam
13W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Schutter
1W–14L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Moccia
12W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ron Cahill
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Weiwei Shu
25W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.